Tag: stock

NextEra Energy: An In-Depth Stock Analysis of one of the Leading Renewable Energy Providers in the U.S.

Introduction to the Company

NextEra Energy, Inc. is one of the largest energy companies in the United States and a global leader in renewable energy. With a strong commitment to sustainability and innovation, NextEra Energy has positioned itself as a key player in the transition toward cleaner energy solutions. The company primarily focuses on generating electricity through renewable sources while maintaining reliability and affordability for millions of customers.

Illustration 1: NextEra Energy logo, symbolizing renewable energy with use of green colour and leaf like wave.

History and Background

NextEra Energy traces its origins back to 1925, when it was founded as Florida Power & Light Company (FPL). Over the years, the company expanded its operations and evolved into a diversified energy powerhouse. In 1984, FPL Group was established as the parent company, and in 2010, it was rebranded as NextEra Energy to reflect its growing emphasis on renewable energy.

Today, NextEra Energy is headquartered in Juno Beach, Florida, and has grown through strategic acquisitions and investments in wind, solar, and battery storage technologies. The company owns and operates one of the world’s largest portfolios of renewable energy assets, making it a key player in the clean energy transition.

Operation and Services

NextEra Energy serves a vast customer base across 49 states in the U.S. and four Canadian provinces. The company operates through two major business segments:

Florida Power & Light Company (FPL) – This segment focuses on electricity generation, transmission, and distribution in Florida. It is the backbone of the company’s regulated electric utility business, serving over 5.8 million customer accounts

NextEra Energy Resources – This segment handles renewable energy generation, including wind, solar, and battery storage projects. It also manages natural gas pipelines and nuclear power plants, ensuring that NextEra Energy is a key player in the transition toward cleaner energy sources

As can be seen from illustration two, the majority of NextEra’s energy generation comes from wind and solar power.


Illustration 2: The generation allocation of NextEra Energy

Wind Energy makes up 67% of its generation while solar makes up 13%. NextEra Enegy is as such a fanatstic company to invest in for those that want to be exposed to the renewable energy market.

The company is also invested in nuclear energy, constituiting 11% of its total energy generation, while only a minor part of the business constituting 6% is part of the Natural gas market.

Challenges and Controversies

Environmental Concerns: Despite its significant investments in renewable energy, NextEra Energy has faced criticism for its environmental impact. The company has been involved in disputes over the development of certain projects that environmental groups claim disrupt ecosystems and communities.  Additionally, the capital-intensive nature of renewable energy projects has raised concerns about the sustainability of its financial practices

Regulatory and Legal Issues: Operating in a highly regulated industry, NextEra Energy has encountered various regulatory and legal challenges. These include disputes over rate adjustments, infrastructure expansion, and compliance with federal and state environmental laws. The company has also been involved in legal battles to block competing energy projects, which has drawn scrutiny and criticism

Competition

NextEra Energy operates in a highly competitive landscape, facing significant competition from other major utility and renewable energy companies. Some of its main competitors include: Southern Company (SO), Duke Energy (DUK), Entergy (ETR9, PPL Corporation (PPL), FirstEnergy (FE), Eversource Energy (ES), Edison International (EIX), Pinnacle West Capital (PNW), OGE Energy (OGE), and IDACORP (IDA).

These companies are all part of the electric utilities industry and compete with NextEra Energy in various aspects, including market share, technological advancements, and regulatory compliance.

NextEra Energy stands out from its competitors by being the world’s largest generator of wind and solar power, leading the transition to a low-carbon future. Its size and expertise gives it a competitive advantage. The investments the company has made in getting more advanced technologies to enhance efficiency and reduce costs, also solidifies their competitive edge.


However, the highly competitive environment in which they operate is a factor that investors should carefully consider, as it could pose potential risks.

Future outlook

Several factors will shape NextEra Energy’s future:

Expansion of Offshore Wind: NextEra Energy’s offshore wind projects will play a critical role in achieving clean energy goals. As more offshore wind projects receive government backing, NextEra stands to benefit from regulatory support and technological advancements.

Electrification of Transportation: As electric vehicle (EV) adoption grows, NextEra Energy is investing in EV infrastructure, including charging stations and grid upgrades to accommodate increased demand.

Advancements in Energy Storage: The development of more efficient and cost-effective battery storage solutions will be crucial for integrating intermittent renewable energy sources like solar and wind.


Stock Analysis

In this section, we will analyze NextEra Energy stock to determine if it is a good investment. Our philosophy is value investing, which means we seek high-quality companies that are undervalued. However, we will provide a comprehensive overview so that investors with different philosophies can evaluate the stock for themselves.

Revenue and Profits

To assess a company’s value and investment potential, revenue and profits are the logical starting points for analysis. A stock represents an actual business, much like the small businesses in your hometown. If someone offered to sell you their company, your first question would likely be about its earnings. The same principle applies when evaluating a publicly traded company—understanding its financial performance is essential before deciding to invest.

Illustration 2 and 3: Revenue of NextEra Energy from 2009 to 2024.

As seen in Illustrations 2 and 3, NextEra Energy’s revenue has shown a long-term growth, particularly in recent years. This expansion is driven by increasing demand for renewable energy, investments in infrastructure, and the company’s leadership in wind and solar power generation. Additionally, supportive government policies, tax incentives, and commitments to clean energy continue to drive sales, positioning NextEra Energy for sustained growth.

However, despite this overall upward trend, NextEra Energy’s revenue growth has experienced fluctuations. As shown in Illustrations 2 and 3, there have been periods where revenue declined due to factors such as regulatory changes, shifts in energy prices, and project timing. The utility and renewable energy sectors are subject to policy adjustments and market dynamics that can impact earnings, making it essential for investors to consider these risks. It is especially important to note that the Trump administration is opposed to the Wind sector which stands for the majority of NextEra’s energy generation.

Even with occasional volatility, the long-term outlook remains strong. With the increasing global transition to renewable energy, NextEra Energy is well-positioned to capitalize on this shift. Its investments in clean energy infrastructure, expansion into emerging markets, and strong operational efficiency suggest a promising future despite short-term revenue fluctuations. However, it has a lot of competitors and the current US administration is not as supportive of renewable energy as previous administrations.

Illustration 4 and 5: Net Income of NextEra Energy from 2009 to 2025

Net income is a crucial metric to evaluate when determining whether a company is a worthwhile investment. It represents a company’s net profit or loss after accounting for all revenues, income items, and expenses, calculated as Net Income = Revenue – Expenses.

As illustrated in Figures 4 and 5, NextEra Energy has experienced significant net income growth over the long term, particularly in recent years. For instance, the company’s net income rose from $3.573 billion in 2021 to $4.147 billion in 2022, marking a 16.06% increase. This upward trend continued in 2023, with net income reaching $7.31 billion—a substantial 76.27% increase from the previous year. This growth is driven by rising global demand for renewable energy, strategic investments in wind and solar projects, and expansion into energy storage and infrastructure development. Additionally, favorable government policies and commitments to clean energy continue to fuel revenue, positioning the company for sustained growth.

However, despite this overall upward trend, NextEra Energy’s net income has experienced fluctuations. In 2024, the company’s net income decreased by approximately 8.79% to $6.952 billion, down from $7.31 billion in 2023. This decline is partly due to increased costs impacting its renewables segment and higher operating expenses. And ofcoursw it had a sharp fall from 2018 to 2020. For investors, this inconsistency raises concerns, as it suggests that NextEra Energy may not deliver steady net income growth year after year, making it a potentially riskier investment compared to companies with more predictable financial performance. Even though net income growth has been inconsistent, the long-term trend remains upward. Considering the rising global demand for energy, the increasing popularity of renewable power, and the momentum of the green energy transition, NextEra Energy is well-positioned for future growth. These factors, combined with the company’s expanding project backlog and strategic partnerships, suggest a promising outlook despite short-term volatility.

Revenue breakdown

Illustration 6: Revenue Breakdown for NextEra Energy, gathered from gurufocus as of NOV 31, 2023.

As can be seen in Illustration 6, the majority of NextEra Energy’s revenue comes from Florida Power & Light Company, but a significant portion (17.8%) is generated by NextEra Energy Resources LLC. This diversification provides investors with exposure to both clean energy growth and the stability of a traditional utility business. Despite cost of goods sold (COGS) consuming a substantial share of its revenue, the company continues to have a significant and good amount of revenue. Additionally, high capital expenditures for clean energy development and grid modernization impact profitability. While NextEra Energy benefits from a strong market position and steady utility revenue, these costs could affect its long-term earnings growth, making it an important factor for investors to consider.

Earnings per shar (EPS)

Earnings Per Share (EPS) is a key financial metric that measures a company’s profitability on a per-share basis. It indicates how much profit a company generates for each outstanding share of its stock, and is used o assess a company’s financial health, profitability, and potential for growth. In other words this metric can tell us how profitable the business is.

Illustration 7: Earnings per share for NextEra Energy from 2009 to 2025

The EPS figure itself isn’t the primary focus for value investors—it can be 0.2 or 10, but what truly matters is the company’s ability to generate consistent earnings growth. A steadily increasing EPS over time signals strong financial health, profitability, and long-term value creation.

The EPS for NextEra Energy has had a generally positive upward trend since 2009. However, it experienced a dramatic fall from 2019 to 2020 due to the economic downturn and market disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, along with increased costs and project delays. This decline can be a red flag for investors, as it highlights the company’s sensitivity to external economic factors and potential volatility in earnings. However, after the fall, the trend has resumed its upward trajectory, supported by strong investments in renewable energy, stable utility revenue from Florida Power & Light, and favorable industry policies. As a result, the EPS has now returned to pre-fall levels, reinforcing NextEra Energy’s resilience and long-term growth potential. The pandemic can also be considered a one-time event, and the fall in 2024 due to rising interest rates and increased costs in the renewables sector can also be seen as a temporary setback rather than a long-term structural issue. Given NextEra Energy’s strong track record of recovery and consistent long-term growth, these fluctuations are likely part of normal business cycles rather than a sign of fundamental weakness.

Assets and Liabilities

Illustration 8 and 9: Assets and liabilities for NextEra Energy from 2009 to 2023

When evaluating a company as a potential investment, understanding its assets and liabilities is crucial. If a local business owner offered to sell their shop to you, one of the first questions—after determining its profitability—would be about its equity and assets. The same principle applies when assessing publicly traded companies like Dominion Energy.

As shown in Illustration 8, NextEra Energy’s total assets reached $177.5 billion in 2023, a strong figure that highlights the company’s financial growth. Additionally, NextEra Energy’s asset base has consistently expanded year over year, increasing from $48.5 billion in 2009 to $177.5 billion in 2023. This steady asset growth is a positive indicator of the company’s ongoing expansion, investments in innovative technologies, and strengthened market position. A continuously growing asset base often signifies a company’s ability to scale operations, acquire new projects, and enhance production capacity which is particularly important in the highly competitive renewable energy industry.

At the same time, NextEra’s total liabilities have also increased significantly, rising from $35.5 billion in 2009 to $119.7 billion in 2023. While such a sharp increase in debt might raise concerns for some investors, it is not necessarily a red flag given the nature of the renewable energy business. Utility companies typically operate in a capital-intensive environment where they must secure substantial financing to fund large-scale projects, develop infrastructure, and maintain their competitive edge. Debt financing is often necessary for expanding wind farm and other types of energy production, all of which contribute to long-term growth.

The key factor for investors is whether NextEra can effectively manage its debt while maintaining strong revenue and profitability. If the company can generate consistent cash flow and sustain high demand for its products and services, its rising liabilities may not be a major issue. However, if debt levels continue to grow faster than revenue or profits, it could indicate financial strain, making it important for investors to monitor the company’s ability to service its obligations while maintaining profitability.

The cash on hand for NextEra is a red flag for potential investors, as the company has $2.7 billion in readily available cash as of 2023. This amount is relatively low compared to its liabilities, which could indicate liquidity concerns and a reliance on external financing to meet obligations and fund growth.

Additionally, NextEra’s long-term debt of $61.4 billion in 2023 is significantly higher than its available cash, which is a red flag for investors. This indicates that the company relies heavily on debt financing, which could pose risks if interest rates rise or if cash flow weakens, potentially impacting its ability to meet financial obligations and sustain growth.

As seen in Illustration 9, Total Shareholder Equity—calculated as total assets minus total liabilities—has consistently grown over the past 14 years. This is a very positive indicator for potential investors, as it suggests that NextEra is building value over time rather than eroding its financial foundation. A steadily increasing shareholder equity indicates that the company’s assets are growing at a faster rate than its liabilities, which is a green flag for financial health. This trend suggests that NextEra is successfully expanding its operations while maintaining a solid balance sheet. Additionally, rising equity provides a buffer against financial downturns, making the company more resilient in times of economic uncertainty. However, investors should also consider how this growth is achieved—whether through profitable operations or increased debt financing—to fully assess the sustainability of this trend.

Debt to Equity Ratio

Illustration 10 and 11: Debt to equity for NextEra Energy from 2009 to 2023

The Debt-to-Equity (D/E) ratio is an important financial metric for assessing Next Era’s financial leverage and risk. It compares the amount of debt the company uses to finance its operations relative to its shareholder equity. A high D/E ratio suggests that the company relies more heavily on debt to fuel growth, which could increase financial risk, especially during economic downturns when managing debt obligations becomes more challenging. In contrast, a lower D/E ratio indicates that Next Era is primarily financed through equity, reducing financial risk but potentially limiting its ability to rapidly expand.

The D/E ratio of NextEra Energy has been on a downward trend from around 2.8 in 2009–2010 to 2.05 in 2024. This is a positive sign for investors since it indicates that the company is gradually reducing its reliance on debt relative to equity. A lower D/E ratio suggests improved financial stability, reduced risk of overleveraging, and a stronger ability to manage long-term obligations while continuing to invest in growth.

Legendary value-investor Warren Buffett prefers a D/E ratio of below 0.5. Compared to 0.5, NextEra is still at a very high level. However, this is normal for companies in the renewable utility industry since they often require significant capital investment to fund large-scale projects, develop infrastructure, and expand renewable energy capacity. While NextEra’s D/E ratio is higher than Buffett’s preferred level, it reflects the capital-intensive nature of the energy sector and the company’s ongoing efforts to scale its operations and meet growing demand for clean energy.

Price to earnings ratio (P/E)

Illustration 12 and 13: Price to earnings ratio for NextEra Energy from 2009 to 2023

For value investors, one of the most critical metrics when evaluating NextEra’s stock is the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio, as it helps assess whether the company is undervalued or overvalued. Even if a company has strong financials, purchasing its stock at a high price can lead to poor returns. For example, imagine a business generating solid profits of $1 million per year. If the owner offers to sell you the business for just $1, it would be an incredible deal. But if the owner asks for $1 trillion, even though the business is profitable, the price would be absurdly overvalued. The stock market works similarly—companies can be priced cheaply on some days and excessively expensive on others.

Warren Buffett, a legendary value investor, typically considers stocks with a P/E ratio of 15 or lower as “bargains.” A high P/E ratio suggests that investors are paying a premium for the company’s earnings, expecting significant growth. However, this also indicates that the stock is expensive relative to its earnings, which can be a red flag for value investors. NextEra’s P/E ratio has been on a relatively stable level from 2010 to 2018. From 2018 as renewable stocks became popular on the stock market its P/E skyrocket to a high of 107.21 in 2022 which is strongly overprices. Before the bubble burst and it came back to 17.19 in 2024.

The mania for renewable energy stocks seems to have slowed down after the bubble burst in 2022. For potential investors, the P/E of 20.2 in 2025 seems fairly priced, meaning that you will not be buying at a bargain but also not overpaying for the stock. If you believe in the company’s future earnings potential and strong fundamentals, it could be a good time to enter at a reasonable valuation and hold for long-term growth.


Dividend

Illustration 14: NextEra Energy’s dividend yield and dividend payout from 1995 to 2025

NextEra Energy stands out among renewable energy companies by offering a consistent dividend, making it an attractive option for income-focused investors. In 2025, NextEra’s annual dividend is $1.55 per share, reflecting its commitment to returning value to shareholders. Additionally, the company has a strong track record of increasing its dividend, with a five-year annualized growth rate of approximately 10%, demonstrating steady financial health and shareholder rewards.

NextEra Energy has demonstrated remarkable consistency in its dividend payments, making it a reliable choice for income-focused investors. The company has increased its dividend for over 25 consecutive years, reflecting strong earnings growth and disciplined financial management. Even during economic downturns and market volatility, NextEra has continued to raise its payouts, reinforcing its commitment to returning value to shareholders. This level of consistency is a positive sign, as it indicates that the company generates stable cash flows and prioritizes rewarding long-term investors while continuing to invest in its renewable energy expansion. However, as can be seen in illustration 14, despite the dividend payout increasing, the dividend yield has been on a steady decline.

While NextEra’s dividend yield of around 2.2% (as of 2025) may not be the highest in the utility sector, it remains a reliable source of income, especially when combined with the company’s long-term growth prospects in renewable energy. For investors seeking a mix of dividend income and exposure to clean energy, NextEra presents a compelling case. However, given its high debt levels and capital-intensive business model, investors should monitor whether the company can sustain its dividend growth while continuing to invest in future expansion.

To summarize:

Green Flag:

  • Consistent Dividend Growth: NextEra has a strong history of dividend increases, making it a solid choice for income investors.
  • Balanced Strategy: The company provides both income and long-term growth potential, appealing to a broad range of investors.

🚩 Red Flag:

  • Debt Reliance: Maintaining dividends alongside significant capital expenditures requires careful financial management.
  • Moderate Yield: While NextEra pays dividends, its yield is lower than some traditional utility stocks.

Insider Trading

Illustration 14: Recent Insider Selling for NextEra Energy

A crucial metric to consider when evaluating whether a company is worth investing in is insider trading activity—specifically, whether company insiders have been buying or selling shares over the past year. It’s particularly important to assess who has been trading, as directors should be monitored even more closely than officers.

As can be seen from the table above, there has been no selling by any mayor insiders recently. The insiders who have been selling stock has been lower level officers and directors of subsidiaries. This is a green flag for investors since it shows that insiders are confident in the company as they have not sold their shares.

Other Company Info

As illustrated below, NextEra Energy currently employs approximately 16,800 individuals, reflecting a steady increase from 14,900 employees in 2020. The company was originally founded in 1925 as Florida Power & Light Company and later rebranded as NextEra Energy in 2010 to reflect its expansion into renewable energy. It is publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol NEE. Operating within the Utilities sector, NextEra Energy is classified under the Electric Utilities industry. The company has approximately 2.06 billion shares outstanding and a market capitalization of around $120 billion USD as of 2024.

Headquartered at 700 Universe Boulevard, Juno Beach, Florida 33408, United States, NextEra Energy’s official website is www.nexteraenergy.com.

Illustration 15-17: : Number of employees at NextEra Energy and its location in Juno Beach, Florida.

Final Verdict

NextEra Energy offers a compelling opportunity for investors seeking exposure to renewable energy, particularly wind and solar power, as well as energy storage solutions. The company has secured significant contracts with major corporations like Google and Walmart and continues to expand its clean energy initiatives. With a strong focus on sustainability and innovation, NextEra is well-positioned to capitalize on the increasing demand for carbon-free energy and play a leading role in the transition to a greener economy.

However, while NextEra Energy has experienced strong growth, there are some concerns related to its financial performance. Despite increasing revenue, high capital expenditures and significant debt levels to fund its renewable energy projects have put pressure on profitability. Additionally, the company’s cost of sales (COGS) remains substantial, impacting margins. While NextEra has maintained a stable dividend and solid market position, its reliance on debt and ongoing capital investment may raise concerns for some investors.

That said, it is important to note that NextEra Energy is a leader in the renewable energy space and is poised for long-term growth given the ongoing expansion of clean energy infrastructure. For growth-oriented investors who believe in the future of renewable energy and are willing to accept potential short-term financial volatility, NextEra presents a strong investment opportunity. However, for more conservative investors seeking a company with consistent profitability and low financial risk, NextEra Energy may not be the ideal choice.

Canadian Solar: A comprehensive overview and stock analysis of one of the leading Solar Companies

Introduction

Canadian Solar Inc. is one of the largest and most established solar energy companies in the world. It has made significant contributions to the global transition toward renewable energy, specifically solar power. With a presence in over 20 countries, Canadian Solar has successfully integrated itself into both the manufacturing of solar photovoltaic (PV) products and the development of solar projects. In this article, we will explore the history, operations, competitive positioning, financials, the future prospects of Canadian Solar and of course make a comprehensive analysis of the stock of Canadian Solar.

History and Founding

Canadian Solar was founded in 2001 by Dr. Shawn Qu, a former University of Toronto researcher with a background in electrical engineering. Dr. Qu, originally from China, started the company in Ontario, Canada, with the goal of providing high-performance solar modules at competitive prices. The company’s initial focus was on manufacturing solar cells and modules, and its breakthrough came with its focus on high efficiency and the development of advanced technologies in the solar industry.

The decision to base the company in Canada was a strategic move, given the country’s growing interest in clean energy and environmental sustainability. However, Canadian Solar’s roots were international, as Dr. Qu leveraged relationships in China for access to affordable manufacturing resources. The company quickly expanded from its Canadian base and set up large-scale manufacturing operations in China, where it remains one of the leading solar module manufacturers today.

Canadian Solar’s commitment to innovation and sustainability has allowed it to grow from a small, niche manufacturer to a global leader in solar energy. The company’s products are now used in residential, commercial, and utility-scale solar projects around the world, making Canadian Solar a key player in the global energy transition.

Canadian Solar Energy Solutions - Energy Partners

Illustration 1: Canadian Solar logo with sun and rays symbolizing commitment to solar power.

Operations and Products

Canadian Solar operates in two major segments: Solar Module Manufacturing and Solar Power Projects.

Solar Module Manufacturing Canadian Solar produces a wide range of photovoltaic (PV) products, including solar modules, inverters, and energy storage systems. Their solar panels are among the most efficient on the market, with varying products designed for different types of consumers, ranging from residential to large-scale commercial and utility installations. The company uses advanced technology such as PERC (Passivated Emitter and Rear Cell) to ensure high efficiency and durability of their modules.

Solar Power Projects Beyond manufacturing, Canadian Solar is actively involved in the development, financing, and operation of solar power projects globally. This segment includes utility-scale solar farms, distributed solar energy systems for commercial and industrial clients, and energy storage solutions.


Canadian Solar has completed over 10 GW of solar projects worldwide, cementing its position as a leading solar energy provider. The company focuses on end-to-end solar solutions, offering customers everything from project development to system integration, operation, and maintenance.

In addition to these, Canadian Solar has made significant strides in the energy storage market. As the world shifts towards renewable energy, energy storage solutions are seen as a key enabler for balancing intermittent power generation from solar and wind energy. Canadian Solar’s energy storage division, which works in tandem with their solar projects, provides customers with grid-independent solutions that help store excess energy for later use.

Revenue Breakdown

The revenue breakdown of Canadian Solar is as follows:

1. Solar Module Manufacturing: This segment represents the largest portion of Canadian Solar’s revenue, contributing approximately 60-70%. The company’s solar modules are sold to both residential and commercial customers and are used in utility-scale projects. This portion of the business continues to grow as demand for solar energy increases globally, driven by favorable government policies, falling solar costs, and rising environmental concerns.

2. Solar Power Projects: The company’s solar power projects segment accounts for around 25-35% of its revenue. This portion includes the sale of solar power plants, as well as ongoing income generated from the operation of these plants. Over the years, Canadian Solar has managed to increase its share of revenue from projects, reflecting the growing demand for large-scale solar farms and distributed generation systems.

3. Energy Storage and Other Products: Although a smaller segment, energy storage systems and other ancillary products are becoming an increasingly important part of Canadian Solar’s portfolio. This segment contributes roughly 5-10% of the company’s total revenue.

The Most Recent Developments In Energy Storage Technology

Illustration 2: Energy Storage is quickly becoming a growing sector for Canadian Solar.

Canadian Solar has also been successful in managing costs and improving operational efficiency. The company’s gross margin has steadily improved due to its focus on high-efficiency products and scaling its manufacturing operations.

Key Competitors

Canadian Solar operates in a very highly competitive market. Its key competitors include:

  • First Solar (FSLR): A US-based solar energy company, First Solar is one of the leading manufacturers of thin-film solar modules. Unlike Canadian Solar, which primarily produces crystalline silicon modules, First Solar specializes in cadmium telluride (CdTe) technology. First Solar is known for its utility-scale solar projects, similar to Canadian Solar’s project development segment.

  • JinkoSolar (JKS): Another Chinese solar giant, JinkoSolar is one of the largest manufacturers of solar panels globally. JinkoSolar’s strength lies in its focus on technology, with an emphasis on increasing panel efficiency and reducing costs. The company’s global footprint is comparable to Canadian Solar’s, and its competitive pricing makes it a formidable rival.
  • Trina Solar (TSL): Trina Solar is another major Chinese player in the solar market. Like Canadian Solar, it operates in both module manufacturing and project development. Trina Solar has a strong presence in Europe, the Americas, and Asia.
  • LONGi Green Energy (601012.SS): LONGi is one of the largest manufacturers of monocrystalline silicon solar products. With a focus on technology and efficiency, LONGi competes directly with Canadian Solar in the module manufacturing market.
  • SunPower (SPWR): Based in the United States, SunPower is a major player in both residential and commercial solar installations. SunPower differentiates itself by offering premium solar products, while Canadian Solar offers a broader range of modules for different market segments.

To sum up, the solar power market is highly competitive with many competitors to challenge Canadian Solar.

Market Position and Competitive Advantages

Despite very high competion Canadian Solar holds a competitive edge in several areas:

Global Reach: With manufacturing facilities in China, Canada, and other parts of the world, Canadian Solar has a robust global supply chain and can cater to customers in diverse markets. Its presence in the Americas, Europe, and Asia ensures that it remains competitive in the global solar market.

Innovation and Technology: Canadian Solar places a strong emphasis on research and development (R&D). The company consistently strives to improve the efficiency and durability of its solar panels, which has helped it maintain its competitive edge. Canadian Solar is at the forefront of solar cell and panel technology, incorporating advanced technologies like PERC and bifacial modules.

Reproducing scientific studies: A Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval

Illustration 3: Canadian Solar’s is well known for being invested in research and development.

Cost Leadership: One of the key drivers behind Canadian Solar’s success is its ability to maintain a competitive price point while offering high-quality products. By leveraging economies of scale and low-cost manufacturing in China, Canadian Solar can keep its prices lower than many competitors while maintaining margins.


Comprehensive Solutions: Unlike some competitors that focus primarily on module manufacturing, Canadian Solar offers a comprehensive solution, including project development and energy storage. This ability to offer turnkey solutions, from manufacturing to operation and maintenance, is a significant advantage in attracting large-scale customers.

Future Outlook

Looking ahead, Canadian Solar is well-positioned to continue its growth. The global transition to renewable energy is accelerating, with solar energy at the forefront. The company’s strong brand, technological innovation, and global footprint provide a solid foundation for its future growth. Canadian Solar is also well-positioned to benefit from government incentives and policies aimed at promoting renewable energy adoption.

With increasing demand for solar energy, growing interest in energy storage, and continued advancements in panel technology, Canadian Solar is expected to remain a leader in the solar industry.

Furthermore, the company’s expansion into emerging markets like India, Africa, and Latin America presents significant growth opportunities.

Stock Analysis

In this section we will analyze Canadian Solar’s stock to see if it is a good stock to buy or not. Our philosophy is value investing meaning that we try to find good quality companies that are undervalued. However, we will give a holistic overview so all kind of investors with different philosophies can judge the stock for themselves.

Revenue and Profits

To determine a company’s worth and if it is worth investing in, the company’s revenue and profits are a natural starting point to analyze. It should never bee forgotten that a stock represents a company just like the small businesses in your home town. If someone asked you if you want to buy their company, the first question would naturally be how much the company makes and the same question when trying to analyze if a company registered in the stock exchange is worth buying.


Illustration 4 and 5: Revenue of Canadian Solar from 2009 to 2023.

As seen in Illustrations 4 and 5, Canadian Solar’s revenue has been increasing over the long term, particularly in recent years. This growth is driven by rising global demand for solar energy, increased module shipments, and expansion into energy storage and project development. Additionally, favorable government policies and renewable energy commitments continue to fuel sales, positioning the company for sustained growth.

However, despite this overall upward trend, Canadian Solar’s revenue growth has been inconsistent. As shown in Illustrations 4 and 5, there have been years—such as 2012, 2016, and 2019—where revenue declined. This volatility is partly due to intense competition in the solar industry, fluctuating market conditions, and policy shifts affecting demand. For investors, this inconsistency raises concerns, as it suggests that Canadian Solar may not deliver steady revenue growth year after year, making it a potentially riskier investment compared to companies with more predictable financial performance.

Even though revenue growth has been inconsistent, the long-term trend remains upward. Considering the rising global demand for energy, the increasing popularity of solar power, and the momentum of the green energy transition, Canadian Solar is well-positioned for future growth. These factors, combined with the company’s expanding product offerings and global presence, suggest a promising outlook despite short-term volatility.

Illustration 6 and 7: Net Income of Canadian Solar from 2009 to 2023.

Net income is a crucial metric to evaluate when determining whether a company is a worthwhile investment. It represents a company’s net profit or loss after accounting for all revenues, income items, and expenses, calculated as Net Income = Revenue – Expenses.

As seen in Illustrations 6 and 7, Canadian Solar’s net profit has shown a slight upward trend but has mostly remained relatively flat with fluctuations since 2014, peaking around 250. This inconsistency is a red flag for potential investors, as it indicates that despite growing revenue, the company has struggled to achieve steady profit growth. Factors such as pricing pressure, industry competition, and fluctuating costs may be limiting profitability, making it difficult for investors to rely on sustained earnings growth. When investing in a company, increasing profits is one of the most—if not the most—important factors for investors. However, Canadian Solar has struggled to achieve consistent profitability, as its net income has remained relatively stable over the years despite growing revenue. This lack of sustained profit growth raises concerns about the company’s ability to improve margins and generate higher returns for shareholders in the long run.

Revenue breakdown

Illustration 8: Revenue Breakdown for Canadian Solar

As seen in Illustration 8, Canadian Solar is a pure-play solar energy company, generating all its revenue from the solar industry. This makes it an ideal investment opportunity for those seeking direct exposure to the solar sector. However, for investors looking for diversification within the broader utility sector, Canadian Solar may not be the best fit, as it lacks revenue streams from other energy sources or utility-related businesses.

Additionally, Illustration 8 highlights that the cost of sales in the solar energy industry is significantly high, which consumes a large portion of Canadian Solar’s revenue. On top of that, the company allocates substantial funds toward R&D, administration, and marketing, further limiting its net profit. As a result, despite strong revenue figures, the company’s actual profitability remains relatively low, which could be a concern for investors focused on earnings growth.

Earnings per shar (EPS)

Earnings Per Share (EPS) is a key financial metric that measures a company’s profitability on a per-share basis. It indicates how much profit a company generates for each outstanding share of its stock, and is used o assess a company’s financial health, profitability, and potential for growth. In other words this metric can tell us how profitable the business is,

Illustration 9: Earnings per share for Canadian Solar from 2009 to 2023.

The EPS figure itself isn’t the primary focus for value investors—it can be 0.2 or 10, but what truly matters is the company’s ability to generate consistent earnings growth. A steadily increasing EPS over time signals strong financial health, profitability, and long-term value creation.

Canadian Solar’s earnings per share (EPS) performance from 2009 to 2023 presents a mixed picture for investors. While the company has demonstrated resilience and growth in revenue over the long term, its EPS has been highly volatile, with significant fluctuations rather than a consistent upward trend. Periods of strong earnings, such as in 2014, have been followed by years of weaker performance, making it difficult for investors to predict steady profit growth. This inconsistency can be a red flag for long-term investors who prioritize stable and growing earnings, as it suggests that Canadian Solar’s profitability is sensitive to external factors like pricing pressure, raw material costs, and government policies.

Assets and Liabilities

Illustration 10 and 11:  Assets, Liabilities and Total Shareholder Equity for Canadian Solar from 2009 to 2023.

When evaluating a company as a potential investment, understanding its assets and liabilities is crucial. If a local business owner offered to sell their shop to you, one of the first questions—after determining its profitability—would be about its equity and assets. The same principle applies when assessing publicly traded companies like Dominion Energy.

As shown in Illustrations 10 and 11, Canadian Solar has a substantial asset base, totaling $11.9 billion in 2024. This steady asset growth over time is a positive sign, indicating that the company is expanding its operations, investing in new technologies, and strengthening its market position. A growing asset base often reflects a company’s ability to scale its business, acquire new projects, and improve its production capacity, which is particularly important in the highly competitive solar energy industry.

At the same time, Canadian Solar’s total liabilities have also increased significantly, rising from $573 million in 2009 to $8.2 billion in 2024. While such a sharp increase in debt might raise concerns for some investors, it is not necessarily a red flag given the nature of the solar energy business. Solar companies typically operate in a capital-intensive environment where they must secure substantial financing to fund large-scale projects, develop infrastructure, and maintain their competitive edge. Debt financing is often necessary for expanding solar farms, increasing manufacturing capacity, and advancing energy storage solutions, all of which contribute to long-term growth.

The key factor for investors is whether Canadian Solar can effectively manage its debt while maintaining strong revenue and profitability. If the company can generate consistent cash flow and sustain high demand for its products and services, its rising liabilities may not be a major issue. However, if debt levels continue to grow faster than revenue or profits, it could indicate financial strain, making it important for investors to monitor the company’s ability to service its obligations while maintaining profitability.

The cash on hand for Canadian Solar is a green flag for potential investors, as the company has $2.9 billion in readily available cash as of 2023. This strong cash reserve provides the company with flexibility and liquidity, enabling it to navigate market fluctuations, invest in new projects, and meet its short-term financial obligations without relying heavily on external financing.

Additionally, Canadian Solar’s long-term debt of $1.65 billion in 2023 is significantly lower than its available cash, which is a positive sign for investors. This indicates that the company has a solid financial cushion and is not overly reliant on debt to fund its operations. It suggests that Canadian Solar is in a strong position to manage its liabilities, fund future growth, and weather economic downturns without significant financial strain. This balance between cash and debt is reassuring for investors, as it reflects financial stability and prudent management of resources.

As seen in Illustration 11, Total Shareholder Equity—calculated as total assets minus total liabilities—has consistently grown over the past 14 years. This is a positive indicator for potential investors, as it suggests that Canadian Solar is building value over time rather than eroding its financial foundation. A steadily increasing shareholder equity indicates that the company’s assets are growing at a faster rate than its liabilities, which is a green flag for financial health. This trend suggests that Canadian Solar is successfully expanding its operations while maintaining a solid balance sheet. Additionally, rising equity provides a buffer against financial downturns, making the company more resilient in times of economic uncertainty. However, investors should also consider how this growth is achieved—whether through profitable operations or increased debt financing—to fully assess the sustainability of this trend.

Debt to Equity Ratio

Illustration 12 and 13: The Debt to Equity ratio of Canadian Solar from 2009 to 2024.

The Debt-to-Equity (D/E) ratio is an important financial metric for assessing Canadian Solar’s financial leverage and risk. It compares the amount of debt the company uses to finance its operations relative to its shareholder equity. A high D/E ratio suggests that the company relies more heavily on debt to fuel growth, which could increase financial risk, especially during economic downturns when managing debt obligations becomes more challenging. In contrast, a lower D/E ratio indicates that Canadian Solar is primarily financed through equity, reducing financial risk but potentially limiting its ability to rapidly expand.

In recent years, Canadian Solar has maintained a relatively high D/E ratio, reflecting its reliance on both debt and equity financing to support its operations. This is typical for companies in the solar industry, as they often need to take on debt to fund large-scale projects, infrastructure, and expansion into new areas like energy storage. However, while leveraging debt is common in the sector, investors should remain cautious and monitor Canadian Solar’s ability to manage its increasing debt load. A high D/E ratio, particularly during periods of rising interest rates or market volatility, can place pressure on profitability and financial stability.

As of 2023, Canadian Solar’s D/E ratio reached nearly 6, and it was also high in 2016 and 2017, exceeding 5. While the company has made strides in reducing its debt and increasing equity over time, its D/E ratio remains substantially higher than the level recommended by investors like Warren Buffett, who prefers a ratio below 0.5. This suggests that while the company has made progress, Canadian Solar still carries a significant debt burden that investors should carefully assess to ensure it does not hinder long-term growth or financial health.

Price to earnings ratio (P/E)

Illustration 14 and 15: The price to earning ratio for Canadian Solar from 2010 to 2024. The P/E ratio was negative and/or not available for 2012 and 2013.

For value investors, one of the most critical metrics when evaluating Canadian Solar’s stock is the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio, as it helps assess whether the company is undervalued or overvalued. Even if a company has strong financials, purchasing its stock at a high price can lead to poor returns. For example, imagine a business generating solid profits of $1 million per year. If the owner offers to sell you the business for just $1, it would be an incredible deal. But if the owner asks for $1 trillion, even though the business is profitable, the price would be absurdly overvalued. The stock market works similarly—companies can be priced cheaply on some days and excessively expensive on others.

Warren Buffett, a legendary value investor, typically considers stocks with a P/E ratio of 15 or lower as “bargains.” A high P/E ratio suggests that investors are paying a premium for the company’s earnings, expecting significant growth. However, this also indicates that the stock is expensive relative to its earnings, which can be a red flag for value investors. Canadian Solar’s P/E ratio has fluctuated widely over the years. For example, it was in bargain territory at 4.93 in 2011, before reaching a strongly overpriced level of 62.2 in 2021. However, with the current P/E ratio of 29.90 at 16 February 2025, Canadian Solar’s stock can be seen as fairly priced, meaning it is neither undervalued nor an ideal investment for value investors seeking a strong bargain.

The strongly fluctuating prices for Canadian Solar indicates that the company’s stock price is volatile relative to its earnings, and signal uncertainty in the market or changing investor expectations about future growth. For potential investors the fluctuating prices gives them the opportunity to buy the stock at bargain price, but they should be very careful not buy at the top.

Dividend

Canadian Solar does not currently offer a dividend, focusing instead on reinvesting its profits into growth initiatives, including expanding solar projects and developing energy storage solutions. This approach is common for growth-focused companies, especially in the renewable energy sector, where significant capital is needed for expansion.

While Canadian Solar doesn’t provide regular income through dividends, its strategy of reinvestment can be appealing to growth investors looking for long-term capital appreciation rather than immediate returns. However, the lack of dividends may be a red flag for income-focused investors who rely on steady income from their investments. This strategy could also limit some investor interest, especially those seeking consistent payouts.

To summarize:

✅ Green Flag:

  • Growth Potential: By reinvesting profits, Canadian Solar is positioning itself for long-term growth in the rapidly expanding solar and renewable energy sectors.
  • Capital Allocation: The company prioritizes strategic investments in projects and innovation over dividend payouts.

🚩 Red Flag:

  • No Dividend: The lack of dividends may deter income-seeking investors, as Canadian Solar reinvests all profits rather than distributing earnings to shareholders.

Insider Trading

A key metric to consider when evaluating Canadian Solar as an investment is insider trading activity, specifically whether company insiders have been buying or selling shares in the past year. It’s important to focus on who is making these transactions, with particular attention to directors, as their actions often provide more insight into the company’s future prospects than those of officers.

As shown in recent data, there has been no insider selling at Canadian Solar. This is a green flag for investors, as it suggests that insiders have confidence in the company’s future performance and are holding on to their shares, rather than liquidating them.

Other Company info

As of the latest data, Canadian Solar employs approximately 22,200 people, reflecting steady growth from around 8,700 employees in 2014. The company was founded in 2001 and is headquartered in Ontario, Canada. It is listed on the NASDAQ exchange under the ticker CSIQ and operates within the Solar Energy industry under the broader Renewable Energy sector. Canadian Solar currently has approximately 73.3 million shares outstanding and a market capitalization of around USD 4.58 billion.

The company’s corporate headquarters is located at 545 Speedvale Avenue West, Guelph, Ontario N1K 1E6, Canada. For more information, you can visit their official website at www.canadiansolar.com.

Illustration 16-18: Number of employees at Canadian Solar and its location in Ontario, Canada.

Canadian Solar presents a promising long-term opportunity, particularly for investors interested in the renewable energy sector. The company is making significant strides in solar energy, energy storage, and utility-scale projects, positioning itself well for the growing demand for sustainable energy solutions. However, its financial health warrants careful consideration.

Although Canadian Solar has a solid asset base, its rising debt levels and increasing liabilities each year contribute to heightened financial risk. A significant portion of its revenue is consumed by costs of goods sold and operating expenses, limiting its profitability. As a result, while Canadian Solar has shown growth, its profitability has been inconsistent, and some of its expansion plans have not met expectations.

From a value investing standpoint, Canadian Solar does not appear to be undervalued, which may make it less appealing for investors seeking stocks with strong financials available at a discount. While the company holds substantial growth potential in the renewable energy sector, it’s crucial for investors to consider the associated risks, especially given its financial structure and profitability challenges. A key concern is that despite the increase in revenue, Canadian Solar’s net profit has remained stagnant, signaling potential inefficiencies or other underlying issues that may affect future profitability. Given these factors, our recommendation is to proceed with caution. If you find our analysis valuable, consider subscribing by entering your email below.

Canadian Solar: A comprehensive overview and stock analysis of one of the leading Solar Companies

Introduction

Canadian Solar Inc. is one of the largest and most established solar energy companies in the world. It has made significant contributions to the global transition toward renewable energy, specifically solar power. With a presence in over 20 countries, Canadian Solar has successfully integrated itself into both the manufacturing of solar photovoltaic (PV) products and the development of solar projects. In this article, we will explore the history, operations, competitive positioning, financials, the future prospects of Canadian Solar and of course make a comprehensive analysis of the stock of Canadian Solar.

History and Founding

Canadian Solar was founded in 2001 by Dr. Shawn Qu, a former University of Toronto researcher with a background in electrical engineering. Dr. Qu, originally from China, started the company in Ontario, Canada, with the goal of providing high-performance solar modules at competitive prices. The company’s initial focus was on manufacturing solar cells and modules, and its breakthrough came with its focus on high efficiency and the development of advanced technologies in the solar industry.

The decision to base the company in Canada was a strategic move, given the country’s growing interest in clean energy and environmental sustainability. However, Canadian Solar’s roots were international, as Dr. Qu leveraged relationships in China for access to affordable manufacturing resources. The company quickly expanded from its Canadian base and set up large-scale manufacturing operations in China, where it remains one of the leading solar module manufacturers today.

Canadian Solar’s commitment to innovation and sustainability has allowed it to grow from a small, niche manufacturer to a global leader in solar energy. The company’s products are now used in residential, commercial, and utility-scale solar projects around the world, making Canadian Solar a key player in the global energy transition.

Canadian Solar Energy Solutions - Energy Partners

Illustration 1: Canadian Solar logo with sun and rays symbolizing commitment to solar power.

Operations and Products

Canadian Solar operates in two major segments: Solar Module Manufacturing and Solar Power Projects.

Solar Module Manufacturing Canadian Solar produces a wide range of photovoltaic (PV) products, including solar modules, inverters, and energy storage systems. Their solar panels are among the most efficient on the market, with varying products designed for different types of consumers, ranging from residential to large-scale commercial and utility installations. The company uses advanced technology such as PERC (Passivated Emitter and Rear Cell) to ensure high efficiency and durability of their modules.

Solar Power Projects Beyond manufacturing, Canadian Solar is actively involved in the development, financing, and operation of solar power projects globally. This segment includes utility-scale solar farms, distributed solar energy systems for commercial and industrial clients, and energy storage solutions.


Canadian Solar has completed over 10 GW of solar projects worldwide, cementing its position as a leading solar energy provider. The company focuses on end-to-end solar solutions, offering customers everything from project development to system integration, operation, and maintenance.

In addition to these, Canadian Solar has made significant strides in the energy storage market. As the world shifts towards renewable energy, energy storage solutions are seen as a key enabler for balancing intermittent power generation from solar and wind energy. Canadian Solar’s energy storage division, which works in tandem with their solar projects, provides customers with grid-independent solutions that help store excess energy for later use.

Revenue Breakdown

The revenue breakdown of Canadian Solar is as follows:

1. Solar Module Manufacturing: This segment represents the largest portion of Canadian Solar’s revenue, contributing approximately 60-70%. The company’s solar modules are sold to both residential and commercial customers and are used in utility-scale projects. This portion of the business continues to grow as demand for solar energy increases globally, driven by favorable government policies, falling solar costs, and rising environmental concerns.

2. Solar Power Projects: The company’s solar power projects segment accounts for around 25-35% of its revenue. This portion includes the sale of solar power plants, as well as ongoing income generated from the operation of these plants. Over the years, Canadian Solar has managed to increase its share of revenue from projects, reflecting the growing demand for large-scale solar farms and distributed generation systems.

3. Energy Storage and Other Products: Although a smaller segment, energy storage systems and other ancillary products are becoming an increasingly important part of Canadian Solar’s portfolio. This segment contributes roughly 5-10% of the company’s total revenue.

The Most Recent Developments In Energy Storage Technology

Illustration 2: Energy Storage is quickly becoming a growing sector for Canadian Solar.

Canadian Solar has also been successful in managing costs and improving operational efficiency. The company’s gross margin has steadily improved due to its focus on high-efficiency products and scaling its manufacturing operations.

Key Competitors

Canadian Solar operates in a very highly competitive market. Its key competitors include:

  • First Solar (FSLR): A US-based solar energy company, First Solar is one of the leading manufacturers of thin-film solar modules. Unlike Canadian Solar, which primarily produces crystalline silicon modules, First Solar specializes in cadmium telluride (CdTe) technology. First Solar is known for its utility-scale solar projects, similar to Canadian Solar’s project development segment.

  • JinkoSolar (JKS): Another Chinese solar giant, JinkoSolar is one of the largest manufacturers of solar panels globally. JinkoSolar’s strength lies in its focus on technology, with an emphasis on increasing panel efficiency and reducing costs. The company’s global footprint is comparable to Canadian Solar’s, and its competitive pricing makes it a formidable rival.
  • Trina Solar (TSL): Trina Solar is another major Chinese player in the solar market. Like Canadian Solar, it operates in both module manufacturing and project development. Trina Solar has a strong presence in Europe, the Americas, and Asia.
  • LONGi Green Energy (601012.SS): LONGi is one of the largest manufacturers of monocrystalline silicon solar products. With a focus on technology and efficiency, LONGi competes directly with Canadian Solar in the module manufacturing market.
  • SunPower (SPWR): Based in the United States, SunPower is a major player in both residential and commercial solar installations. SunPower differentiates itself by offering premium solar products, while Canadian Solar offers a broader range of modules for different market segments.

To sum up, the solar power market is highly competitive with many competitors to challenge Canadian Solar.

Market Position and Competitive Advantages

Despite very high competion Canadian Solar holds a competitive edge in several areas:

Global Reach: With manufacturing facilities in China, Canada, and other parts of the world, Canadian Solar has a robust global supply chain and can cater to customers in diverse markets. Its presence in the Americas, Europe, and Asia ensures that it remains competitive in the global solar market.

Innovation and Technology: Canadian Solar places a strong emphasis on research and development (R&D). The company consistently strives to improve the efficiency and durability of its solar panels, which has helped it maintain its competitive edge. Canadian Solar is at the forefront of solar cell and panel technology, incorporating advanced technologies like PERC and bifacial modules.

Reproducing scientific studies: A Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval

Illustration 3: Canadian Solar’s is well known for being invested in research and development.

Cost Leadership: One of the key drivers behind Canadian Solar’s success is its ability to maintain a competitive price point while offering high-quality products. By leveraging economies of scale and low-cost manufacturing in China, Canadian Solar can keep its prices lower than many competitors while maintaining margins.


Comprehensive Solutions: Unlike some competitors that focus primarily on module manufacturing, Canadian Solar offers a comprehensive solution, including project development and energy storage. This ability to offer turnkey solutions, from manufacturing to operation and maintenance, is a significant advantage in attracting large-scale customers.

Future Outlook

Looking ahead, Canadian Solar is well-positioned to continue its growth. The global transition to renewable energy is accelerating, with solar energy at the forefront. The company’s strong brand, technological innovation, and global footprint provide a solid foundation for its future growth. Canadian Solar is also well-positioned to benefit from government incentives and policies aimed at promoting renewable energy adoption.

With increasing demand for solar energy, growing interest in energy storage, and continued advancements in panel technology, Canadian Solar is expected to remain a leader in the solar industry.

Furthermore, the company’s expansion into emerging markets like India, Africa, and Latin America presents significant growth opportunities.

Stock Analysis

In this section we will analyze Canadian Solar’s stock to see if it is a good stock to buy or not. Our philosophy is value investing meaning that we try to find good quality companies that are undervalued. However, we will give a holistic overview so all kind of investors with different philosophies can judge the stock for themselves.

Revenue and Profits

To determine a company’s worth and if it is worth investing in, the company’s revenue and profits are a natural starting point to analyze. It should never bee forgotten that a stock represents a company just like the small businesses in your home town. If someone asked you if you want to buy their company, the first question would naturally be how much the company makes and the same question when trying to analyze if a company registered in the stock exchange is worth buying.


Illustration 4 and 5: Revenue of Canadian Solar from 2009 to 2023.

As seen in Illustrations 4 and 5, Canadian Solar’s revenue has been increasing over the long term, particularly in recent years. This growth is driven by rising global demand for solar energy, increased module shipments, and expansion into energy storage and project development. Additionally, favorable government policies and renewable energy commitments continue to fuel sales, positioning the company for sustained growth.

However, despite this overall upward trend, Canadian Solar’s revenue growth has been inconsistent. As shown in Illustrations 4 and 5, there have been years—such as 2012, 2016, and 2019—where revenue declined. This volatility is partly due to intense competition in the solar industry, fluctuating market conditions, and policy shifts affecting demand. For investors, this inconsistency raises concerns, as it suggests that Canadian Solar may not deliver steady revenue growth year after year, making it a potentially riskier investment compared to companies with more predictable financial performance.

Even though revenue growth has been inconsistent, the long-term trend remains upward. Considering the rising global demand for energy, the increasing popularity of solar power, and the momentum of the green energy transition, Canadian Solar is well-positioned for future growth. These factors, combined with the company’s expanding product offerings and global presence, suggest a promising outlook despite short-term volatility.

Illustration 6 and 7: Net Income of Canadian Solar from 2009 to 2023.

Net income is a crucial metric to evaluate when determining whether a company is a worthwhile investment. It represents a company’s net profit or loss after accounting for all revenues, income items, and expenses, calculated as Net Income = Revenue – Expenses.

As seen in Illustrations 6 and 7, Canadian Solar’s net profit has shown a slight upward trend but has mostly remained relatively flat with fluctuations since 2014, peaking around 250. This inconsistency is a red flag for potential investors, as it indicates that despite growing revenue, the company has struggled to achieve steady profit growth. Factors such as pricing pressure, industry competition, and fluctuating costs may be limiting profitability, making it difficult for investors to rely on sustained earnings growth. When investing in a company, increasing profits is one of the most—if not the most—important factors for investors. However, Canadian Solar has struggled to achieve consistent profitability, as its net income has remained relatively stable over the years despite growing revenue. This lack of sustained profit growth raises concerns about the company’s ability to improve margins and generate higher returns for shareholders in the long run.

Revenue breakdown

Illustration 8: Revenue Breakdown for Canadian Solar

As seen in Illustration 8, Canadian Solar is a pure-play solar energy company, generating all its revenue from the solar industry. This makes it an ideal investment opportunity for those seeking direct exposure to the solar sector. However, for investors looking for diversification within the broader utility sector, Canadian Solar may not be the best fit, as it lacks revenue streams from other energy sources or utility-related businesses.

Additionally, Illustration 8 highlights that the cost of sales in the solar energy industry is significantly high, which consumes a large portion of Canadian Solar’s revenue. On top of that, the company allocates substantial funds toward R&D, administration, and marketing, further limiting its net profit. As a result, despite strong revenue figures, the company’s actual profitability remains relatively low, which could be a concern for investors focused on earnings growth.

Earnings per shar (EPS)

Earnings Per Share (EPS) is a key financial metric that measures a company’s profitability on a per-share basis. It indicates how much profit a company generates for each outstanding share of its stock, and is used o assess a company’s financial health, profitability, and potential for growth. In other words this metric can tell us how profitable the business is,

Illustration 9: Earnings per share for Canadian Solar from 2009 to 2023.

The EPS figure itself isn’t the primary focus for value investors—it can be 0.2 or 10, but what truly matters is the company’s ability to generate consistent earnings growth. A steadily increasing EPS over time signals strong financial health, profitability, and long-term value creation.

Canadian Solar’s earnings per share (EPS) performance from 2009 to 2023 presents a mixed picture for investors. While the company has demonstrated resilience and growth in revenue over the long term, its EPS has been highly volatile, with significant fluctuations rather than a consistent upward trend. Periods of strong earnings, such as in 2014, have been followed by years of weaker performance, making it difficult for investors to predict steady profit growth. This inconsistency can be a red flag for long-term investors who prioritize stable and growing earnings, as it suggests that Canadian Solar’s profitability is sensitive to external factors like pricing pressure, raw material costs, and government policies.

Assets and Liabilities

Illustration 10 and 11:  Assets, Liabilities and Total Shareholder Equity for Canadian Solar from 2009 to 2023.

When evaluating a company as a potential investment, understanding its assets and liabilities is crucial. If a local business owner offered to sell their shop to you, one of the first questions—after determining its profitability—would be about its equity and assets. The same principle applies when assessing publicly traded companies like Dominion Energy.

As shown in Illustrations 10 and 11, Canadian Solar has a substantial asset base, totaling $11.9 billion in 2024. This steady asset growth over time is a positive sign, indicating that the company is expanding its operations, investing in new technologies, and strengthening its market position. A growing asset base often reflects a company’s ability to scale its business, acquire new projects, and improve its production capacity, which is particularly important in the highly competitive solar energy industry.

At the same time, Canadian Solar’s total liabilities have also increased significantly, rising from $573 million in 2009 to $8.2 billion in 2024. While such a sharp increase in debt might raise concerns for some investors, it is not necessarily a red flag given the nature of the solar energy business. Solar companies typically operate in a capital-intensive environment where they must secure substantial financing to fund large-scale projects, develop infrastructure, and maintain their competitive edge. Debt financing is often necessary for expanding solar farms, increasing manufacturing capacity, and advancing energy storage solutions, all of which contribute to long-term growth.

The key factor for investors is whether Canadian Solar can effectively manage its debt while maintaining strong revenue and profitability. If the company can generate consistent cash flow and sustain high demand for its products and services, its rising liabilities may not be a major issue. However, if debt levels continue to grow faster than revenue or profits, it could indicate financial strain, making it important for investors to monitor the company’s ability to service its obligations while maintaining profitability.

The cash on hand for Canadian Solar is a green flag for potential investors, as the company has $2.9 billion in readily available cash as of 2023. This strong cash reserve provides the company with flexibility and liquidity, enabling it to navigate market fluctuations, invest in new projects, and meet its short-term financial obligations without relying heavily on external financing.

Additionally, Canadian Solar’s long-term debt of $1.65 billion in 2023 is significantly lower than its available cash, which is a positive sign for investors. This indicates that the company has a solid financial cushion and is not overly reliant on debt to fund its operations. It suggests that Canadian Solar is in a strong position to manage its liabilities, fund future growth, and weather economic downturns without significant financial strain. This balance between cash and debt is reassuring for investors, as it reflects financial stability and prudent management of resources.

As seen in Illustration 11, Total Shareholder Equity—calculated as total assets minus total liabilities—has consistently grown over the past 14 years. This is a positive indicator for potential investors, as it suggests that Canadian Solar is building value over time rather than eroding its financial foundation. A steadily increasing shareholder equity indicates that the company’s assets are growing at a faster rate than its liabilities, which is a green flag for financial health. This trend suggests that Canadian Solar is successfully expanding its operations while maintaining a solid balance sheet. Additionally, rising equity provides a buffer against financial downturns, making the company more resilient in times of economic uncertainty. However, investors should also consider how this growth is achieved—whether through profitable operations or increased debt financing—to fully assess the sustainability of this trend.

Debt to Equity Ratio

Illustration 12 and 13: The Debt to Equity ratio of Canadian Solar from 2009 to 2024.

The Debt-to-Equity (D/E) ratio is an important financial metric for assessing Canadian Solar’s financial leverage and risk. It compares the amount of debt the company uses to finance its operations relative to its shareholder equity. A high D/E ratio suggests that the company relies more heavily on debt to fuel growth, which could increase financial risk, especially during economic downturns when managing debt obligations becomes more challenging. In contrast, a lower D/E ratio indicates that Canadian Solar is primarily financed through equity, reducing financial risk but potentially limiting its ability to rapidly expand.

In recent years, Canadian Solar has maintained a relatively high D/E ratio, reflecting its reliance on both debt and equity financing to support its operations. This is typical for companies in the solar industry, as they often need to take on debt to fund large-scale projects, infrastructure, and expansion into new areas like energy storage. However, while leveraging debt is common in the sector, investors should remain cautious and monitor Canadian Solar’s ability to manage its increasing debt load. A high D/E ratio, particularly during periods of rising interest rates or market volatility, can place pressure on profitability and financial stability.

As of 2023, Canadian Solar’s D/E ratio reached nearly 6, and it was also high in 2016 and 2017, exceeding 5. While the company has made strides in reducing its debt and increasing equity over time, its D/E ratio remains substantially higher than the level recommended by investors like Warren Buffett, who prefers a ratio below 0.5. This suggests that while the company has made progress, Canadian Solar still carries a significant debt burden that investors should carefully assess to ensure it does not hinder long-term growth or financial health.

Price to earnings ratio (P/E)

Illustration 14 and 15: The price to earning ratio for Canadian Solar from 2010 to 2024. The P/E ratio was negative and/or not available for 2012 and 2013.

For value investors, one of the most critical metrics when evaluating Canadian Solar’s stock is the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio, as it helps assess whether the company is undervalued or overvalued. Even if a company has strong financials, purchasing its stock at a high price can lead to poor returns. For example, imagine a business generating solid profits of $1 million per year. If the owner offers to sell you the business for just $1, it would be an incredible deal. But if the owner asks for $1 trillion, even though the business is profitable, the price would be absurdly overvalued. The stock market works similarly—companies can be priced cheaply on some days and excessively expensive on others.

Warren Buffett, a legendary value investor, typically considers stocks with a P/E ratio of 15 or lower as “bargains.” A high P/E ratio suggests that investors are paying a premium for the company’s earnings, expecting significant growth. However, this also indicates that the stock is expensive relative to its earnings, which can be a red flag for value investors. Canadian Solar’s P/E ratio has fluctuated widely over the years. For example, it was in bargain territory at 4.93 in 2011, before reaching a strongly overpriced level of 62.2 in 2021. However, with the current P/E ratio of 29.90 at 16 February 2025, Canadian Solar’s stock can be seen as fairly priced, meaning it is neither undervalued nor an ideal investment for value investors seeking a strong bargain.

The strongly fluctuating prices for Canadian Solar indicates that the company’s stock price is volatile relative to its earnings, and signal uncertainty in the market or changing investor expectations about future growth. For potential investors the fluctuating prices gives them the opportunity to buy the stock at bargain price, but they should be very careful not buy at the top.

Dividend

Canadian Solar does not currently offer a dividend, focusing instead on reinvesting its profits into growth initiatives, including expanding solar projects and developing energy storage solutions. This approach is common for growth-focused companies, especially in the renewable energy sector, where significant capital is needed for expansion.

While Canadian Solar doesn’t provide regular income through dividends, its strategy of reinvestment can be appealing to growth investors looking for long-term capital appreciation rather than immediate returns. However, the lack of dividends may be a red flag for income-focused investors who rely on steady income from their investments. This strategy could also limit some investor interest, especially those seeking consistent payouts.

To summarize:

✅ Green Flag:

  • Growth Potential: By reinvesting profits, Canadian Solar is positioning itself for long-term growth in the rapidly expanding solar and renewable energy sectors.
  • Capital Allocation: The company prioritizes strategic investments in projects and innovation over dividend payouts.

🚩 Red Flag:

  • No Dividend: The lack of dividends may deter income-seeking investors, as Canadian Solar reinvests all profits rather than distributing earnings to shareholders.

Insider Trading

A key metric to consider when evaluating Canadian Solar as an investment is insider trading activity, specifically whether company insiders have been buying or selling shares in the past year. It’s important to focus on who is making these transactions, with particular attention to directors, as their actions often provide more insight into the company’s future prospects than those of officers.

As shown in recent data, there has been no insider selling at Canadian Solar. This is a green flag for investors, as it suggests that insiders have confidence in the company’s future performance and are holding on to their shares, rather than liquidating them.

Other Company info

As of the latest data, Canadian Solar employs approximately 22,200 people, reflecting steady growth from around 8,700 employees in 2014. The company was founded in 2001 and is headquartered in Ontario, Canada. It is listed on the NASDAQ exchange under the ticker CSIQ and operates within the Solar Energy industry under the broader Renewable Energy sector. Canadian Solar currently has approximately 73.3 million shares outstanding and a market capitalization of around USD 4.58 billion.

The company’s corporate headquarters is located at 545 Speedvale Avenue West, Guelph, Ontario N1K 1E6, Canada. For more information, you can visit their official website at www.canadiansolar.com.

Illustration 16-18: Number of employees at Canadian Solar and its location in Ontario, Canada.

Canadian Solar presents a promising long-term opportunity, particularly for investors interested in the renewable energy sector. The company is making significant strides in solar energy, energy storage, and utility-scale projects, positioning itself well for the growing demand for sustainable energy solutions. However, its financial health warrants careful consideration.

Although Canadian Solar has a solid asset base, its rising debt levels and increasing liabilities each year contribute to heightened financial risk. A significant portion of its revenue is consumed by costs of goods sold and operating expenses, limiting its profitability. As a result, while Canadian Solar has shown growth, its profitability has been inconsistent, and some of its expansion plans have not met expectations.

From a value investing standpoint, Canadian Solar does not appear to be undervalued, which may make it less appealing for investors seeking stocks with strong financials available at a discount. While the company holds substantial growth potential in the renewable energy sector, it’s crucial for investors to consider the associated risks, especially given its financial structure and profitability challenges. A key concern is that despite the increase in revenue, Canadian Solar’s net profit has remained stagnant, signaling potential inefficiencies or other underlying issues that may affect future profitability. Given these factors, our recommendation is to proceed with caution. If you find our analysis valuable, consider subscribing by entering your email below.

Constellation Energy: A Powerhouse in Clean Energy and Strategic Growth (Stock Analysis)

Introduction

Constellation Energy Corporation stands as a prominent American energy company specializing in electric power, natural gas, and energy management services. Serving approximately two million customers across the continental United States, Constellation has solidified its position as a key player in the nation’s energy sector.

Company History

The origins of Constellation Energy trace back to 1999 when Baltimore Gas and Electric Company (BGE) established it as a holding company. Over the years, Constellation expanded its operations, becoming a Fortune 500 company and one of the largest electricity producers in the United States. In 2012, a significant merger with Exelon Corporation occurred, leading to the rebranding of its energy supply business as Constellation, an Exelon company. This merger integrated Constellation’s extensive energy production capabilities with Exelon’s resources, enhancing its market presence.

A decade later, in 2022, Constellation Energy was spun off from Exelon, reestablishing itself as an independent entity. Former subsidiary Baltimore Gas & Electric remained part of Exelon. Since becoming independent, Constellation has grown and made headlines by, in September 2024, entering into a contract with Microsoft to restart the undamaged nuclear reactor at the Three Mile Island plant. The company is also planning to upgrade other existing reactor plants to provide more power.

In January 2025, Constellation agreed to acquire the natural gas and geothermal power provider Calpine for $16.4 billion ($26.6bn including debt) in a cash-and-stock deal. Approval of the purchase by state and federal regulators will be necessary.

Operations and Business Overview

Constellation Energy operates a diverse portfolio of energy assets, encompassing nuclear, natural gas, wind, solar, and hydroelectric power. With a total capacity of approximately 32,400 megawatts, the company generates enough energy to power 16 million homes and businesses. Notably, Constellation is the nation’s largest producer of carbon-free energy, contributing to 10% of all clean power on the U.S. grid. This diverse energy mix not only ensures reliability but also underscores the company’s commitment to sustainability.

Illustration 1: Constellation Energy logo symbolizing energy flow and commitment to sustainability.

Constellation Energy’s operation currently includes natural gas, nuclear energy, wind energy, hydro energy and solar energy. The company will probably also het into geothermal power after the aquisition of Calpine.

Customer Base and Energy Supply

Constellation Energy serves a wide range of customers, from residential users to large industrial corporations and government entities. Many Fortune 500 companies, including Amazon, Microsoft, and McDonald’s, have signed long-term power agreements with Constellation to secure 100% renewable energy for their operations.


Illustration 2: Constellation Energy Generating Cpacity breakdown

The largest energy source for Constellation in Nuclear energy. Constellation Energy is the largest producer of carbon-free electricity in the U.S., with 23 nuclear reactors across 14 sites producing about 21,000 megawatts (MW) of clean energy. Constellation’s nuclear fleet is primarily located in Illinois, Maryland, New York, and Pennsylvania. The company has heavily invested in extending the life of existing nuclear plants and is exploring small modular reactors (SMRs) as part of its future strategy. The company has heavily invested in extending the life of existing nuclear plants and is exploring small modular reactors (SMRs) as part of its future strategy.

While Constellation focuses on clean energy, natural gas-fired power plants remain an important part of its operations. The company has 6,000+ MW of natural gas capacity, making it one of the largest gas-fired power producers in the country, and it is its second largest energy source at the moment.

As part of its clean energy initiative, Constellation operates multiple large-scale wind and solar farms across the U.S. Constellation Energy also operates hydroelectric power plants, although this segment represents a smaller portion of its total energy mix.

Competitors and Competitive Advantage

In the competitive energy market, Constellation Energy faces competition from major providers such as Duke Energy, NextEra Energy, and Southern Company. Constellation’s competitive advantage lies in its diverse energy mix, substantial carbon-free energy production, and strategic partnerships. The company’s focus on renewable energy and innovative solutions positions it well to meet the evolving demands of the energy market.

Illustration 3: Constellation Energy is a big player in the Nuclear Energy Market

One of Constellation’s major competitive advantages is its nuclear energy infrastructure, which ensures stable, 24/7 clean energy compared to intermittent renewables like wind and solar. The company has also secured long-term energy contracts with major corporations like Amazon, Microsoft, and McDonald’s, providing a steady revenue stream. Additionally, Constellation is investing in carbon capture technology, hydrogen development, and smart grid innovations to stay ahead in the clean energy transition.

Community Engagement

Beyond its business operations, Constellation is deeply involved in community initiatives. The company ranks second in local corporate giving among Baltimore-based companies, donating $7.10 million in 2017. Additionally, Constellation provides grants to local schools that implement education programs promoting science and technology, reflecting its commitment to fostering education and community development.


Stock Analysis

Revenue and Profit

To assess a company’s true value and investment potential, analyzing its revenue and profits is a fundamental first step. It’s important to remember that a stock represents ownership in a real business, much like the small companies in your local community. If a small business owner approached you with an offer to buy their company, your first questions would likely be: “What’s the price?” and “How much does the company generate in revenue and profit each year?”

Beyond just current earnings, it’s crucial to examine the company’s financial performance over time. This helps determine whether recent profits are part of a consistent upward trend, or if they are temporary spikes or part of a larger decline. A long-term perspective ensures that an investment is based on sustainable growth rather than short-term fluctuations.

Illustration 4 and 5: Revenue of Constellation Energy from 2019 to 2023. Due to Constellation becoming an independent company from Exelon first in 2022, numbers for Constellation Energy is not available before 2019.

As illustrated in Figures 4 and 5, Constellation Energy’s revenue has shown a steady upward trend over the past five years. While this may not provide a long-term dataset for deep historical analysis, the consistent growth in revenue is a positive indicator that should not be overlooked by investors. A steadily increasing revenue stream suggests strong demand, effective business operations, and potential for future profitability. Moreover, this trend signals that the company is successfully expanding its market presence and capitalizing on industry growth opportunities, making it a promising prospect for long-term investors.

Revenue breakdown

Illustration 6: Revenue breakdown of Constellation Energy gathered from gurufocus.

As shown in Illustration 6, Constellation Energy’s revenue comes from a diverse range of sources, which is a positive sign for investors. A diversified revenue stream indicates that the company is not overly reliant on any single source of income, reducing risk and providing stability. However, it’s important to note that the company’s COGS (Cost of Goods Sold) eats up a significant portion of its revenue. This is a negative aspect, as high operating costs, particularly related to fuel and maintenance, eat into profitability. While it is common in the energy sector, the substantial impact of these costs means that a large chunk of revenue is absorbed by expenses, limiting the company’s ability to generate higher profits.

Net Income

Illustration 7 and 8: Net Income of Constellation Energy for the past five years. Due to Constellation becoming an independent company from Exelon first in 2022, numbers for Constellation Energy is not available before 2019.

Net income is a crucial metric to evaluate when determining whether a company is a worthwhile investment. It represents a company’s net profit or loss after accounting for all revenues, income items, and expenses, calculated as Net Income = Revenue – Expenses.

The Net Income of Constellation Energy raises a red flag, as it has not only remained at a low level but has also been negative at times, meaning the company’s expenses have exceeded its revenue. This suggests that Constellation has been operating at a loss in certain periods, which is concerning for potential investors. Negative net income indicates that the company is struggling to control costs or increase profitability, which could raise doubts about its financial health and ability to generate sustainable returns. It is crucial for investors to carefully monitor this trend, as ongoing losses could signal deeper operational or strategic issues that need to be addressed.

Earnings per Share (EPS)

Illustration 9: Earnings per share for Constellation Energy from 2019 to 2013. Due to Constellation becoming an independent company from Exelon first in 2022, numbers for Constellation Energy is not available before 2019.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) is a key financial metric that measures a company’s profitability on a per-share basis. It indicates how much profit a company generates for each outstanding share of its stock, and is used o assess a company’s financial health, profitability, and potential for growth. In other words this metric can tell us how profitable the business is. The EPS figure itself isn’t the primary focus for value investors—it can be 0.2 or 10, but what truly matters is the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio and the company’s ability to generate consistent earnings growth. A steadily increasing EPS over time signals strong financial health, profitability, and long-term value creation.

For Constellation Energy, its EPS performance raises concerns, making it more of a red flag than a green one. Over the past few years, Constellation’s EPS has been inconsistent, with periods of negative earnings, indicating that the company has struggled with profitability. A fluctuating or negative EPS is a warning sign for investors, as it suggests unstable earnings and financial uncertainty. Ideally, long-term investors look for companies with a steadily growing EPS, as this signals strong financial health and increasing shareholder value—something Constellation has yet to demonstrate consistently.

Additionally, because Constellation operates in the capital-intensive energy sector, high costs related to fuel, maintenance, and infrastructure investments eat into its profits, making it difficult to maintain a strong EPS. Unless the company significantly improves its profitability, reduces its cost structure, or benefits from external factors like rising electricity prices, its EPS will remain a concern for investors looking for stability and long-term growth. While Constellation Energy has potential in the clean energy sector, its EPS performance suggests higher risk, making it less attractive for conservative, value-focused investors.

Assets and Liabilities

Illustration 10 and 11: Assets and Liabilities of Constellation Energy from 2019 to 2023. ue to Constellation becoming an independent company from Exelon first in 2022, numbers for Constellation Energy is not available before 2019.

When evaluating a company as a potential investment, understanding its assets and liabilities is crucial. If a local businesses offered to sell their shop to you —after determining revenue and profit—you would be asking about the business’s debt and the value of its assets. The same principle applies when assessing publicly traded companies like Constellation Energy.

The company’s assets have remained consistently high, fluctuating between $48-50 billion USD, which is a positive sign of financial stability. Notably, its total assets exceed its liabilities and debt, indicating a strong financial position and overall good financial health. This is generally a green flag for investors, as it suggests the company has a solid foundation to support its operations.

However, as illustrated in Figure 10, a concerning trend has emerged. Over the past five years, total liabilities and debt have steadily increased, while the company’s assets have remained stagnant. This shift is a negative signal, as it suggests that the company’s financial position has weakened over time. An increasing debt burden without corresponding asset growth raises questions about how efficiently the company is managing its finances and whether it is taking on too much risk.

Additionally, Constellation Energy’s cash on hand is at a worryingly low level, especially when compared to its rising debt. This is a red flag, as it indicates the company may not be adequately prepared to handle financial downturns, unexpected expenses, or economic uncertainties. A low cash reserve limits flexibility and could force the company to take on more debt or issue new shares in difficult times, potentially diluting shareholder value.

While the company remains financially stable for now, investors should closely monitor its rising debt levels and limited cash reserves, as these factors could impact long-term financial sustainability and overall risk exposure. The most important indicator when assessing a company’s financial health is Total Shareholder Equity, which is calculated as: Total Shareholder Equity=Total Assets−Total Liabilities. As can be seen from illustration 11, its total shareholder equity has gradually decreased because of rising liabiltities something that is a red flag for potential investors and should be closely monitored.

Debt to Equity Ratio

Illustration 12: The Debt to Equity Ratio of Constellation Energy from 2019 to 2014.

The Debt-to-Equity (D/E) ratio is a key financial metric used to assess a company’s financial leverage and risk. It measures how much debt a company uses to finance its operations relative to shareholder equity. A high D/E ratio (greater than 1.0) suggests that the company relies heavily on debt financing, which can amplify financial risk, particularly during economic downturns when debt obligations may become more difficult to manage. In contrast, a low D/E ratio (below 1.0) indicates that the company is primarily financed through equity rather than debt, reducing financial risk but potentially limiting rapid expansion. A negative D/E ratio, on the other hand, signals that a company has more liabilities than equity—often considered a warning sign for investors.

Constellation Energy has a high D/E which was 3.5 in 2024, and has generally been over 3 the past 5 years which is a very high level. Constellation Energy’s D/E ratio has remained at an elevated level, meaning that the company is more dependent on debt financing rather than funding growth through retained earnings or equity. This is particularly concerning because rising interest rates and economic downturns could make it harder for the company to manage its debt burden. If Constellation continues to accumulate liabilities while its equity remains stagnant or grows at a slower pace, it could lead to higher financial strain and potential difficulties in meeting debt obligations.

A high D/E ratio is not unusual for utility companies, as they often require significant capital investment for infrastructure, maintenance, and expansion. However, when compared to competitors, Constellation’s debt levels are on the higher side, making it a riskier choice for conservative investors.

Price to earnings ratio (P/E)

Illustration 13 and 14: P/E ratio for Constellation Energy from 2019 to 2025. The P/E ratio was negative for 2021 and 2022 as the EPS was negative.

For value investors, the most important metric when evaluating a stock is the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio, which helps determine whether a company is undervalued or overvalued. if a company has outstanding financials, buying its stock at an excessively high price can lead to poor returns. To illustrate this, imagine a local barber shop that generates solid profits. If the owner offers to sell you the business for $1, it would be an incredible dery al. However, if he tries to sell it for $1 billion, no matter how successful the shop is, the price would be absurdly overvalued. The stock market operates in a similar way—companies can be cheaply priced on some days and highly expensive on others.

In the past couple of years the P/E ratio of Constellation has been around 23-24 which is average and suggest that the company is neither undervalued nor overvalued. However, the P/E ratio of 33,77 in January 2025 can be considered high. A high P/E ratio suggests that the company’s stock is priced at a premium relative to its earnings, indicating that investors expect substantial future growth. However, such expectations may not align with the company’s actual performance, especially considering Constellation Energy’s recent financial challenges, including inconsistent earnings and rising debt levels. It’s also important to note that Constellation Energy’s P/E ratio has experienced considerable volatility. For instance, at the end of 2022, the company had a negative P/E ratio of -177, reflecting periods of negative earnings. The P/E is a negative flag and suggest that the price is too high for valueinvestors.

Dividend

The company follows a quarterly dividend payment schedule. For instance, in 2024, dividends of $0.3525 per share were declared in February, May, July, and November, with corresponding ex-dividend dates and payment dates in the subsequent months. This regularity provides investors with a predictable income stream.

Constellation Energy has demonstrated a consistent increase in its dividend payouts over the past few years. Here’s a summary of the annual dividends per share:

  • 2024: $1.41
  • 2023: $1.128
  • 2022: $0.564

t’s important to note that Constellation Energy’s dividend yield remains relatively modest compared to industry averages. As of January 2025, the yield stands at 0.42%, which is lower than the typical yield for utility companies. The company’s dividend payout ratio stands at around 15.55%, suggesting that a modest portion of earnings is allocated to dividends, which may indicate potential for future increases.

In summary, Constellation Energy’s increasing dividends and consistent payment schedule are positive indicators for investors seeking stable returns. However, the yield is modest, and the company’s payout ratio is prudent. This reflects a strategy aimed at sustainable growth and financial stability, but is also bad news for dividend investors as the dividend for Constellation Energy is far lower compared to other utility companies and to the stock market as a whole.

Insider Trading

A crucial metric to consider when evaluating whether a company is worth investing in is insider trading activity—specifically, whether company insiders have been buying or selling shares over the past year. It’s particularly important to assess who has been trading, as directors should be monitored even more closely than officers.

As can be seen from the table below, there has been no selling by any insiders recently. This is a green flag for investors since it shows that insiders are confident in the company as they have not sold their shares.

Illustration 15: Most recent Constellation Energy Insider Trades

Other Company Info

As illustrated below, Constellation Energy currently employs approximately 13,871 individuals, reflecting a steady increase from 11,696 employees in 2021.The company was established in 1999 and, following a merger with Exelon in 2012, re-emerged as an independent entity in 2022 after a corporate spin-off. It is publicly traded on the NASDAQ stock exchange under the ticker symbol CEG. Operating within the Utilities sector, Constellation Energy is classified under the Multi-Utilities industry.The company has approximately 319 million shares outstanding and a market capitalization of around $95.453 billion USD.

Headquartered at 1310 Point Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21231, United States, Constellation Energy’s official website is http://www.constellationenergy.com.

Final Verdict

Constellation Energy offers an exciting opportunity for investors looking to gain exposure to nuclear and renewable energy. The company has secured high-profile business deals with Amazon and Microsoft and has contracts in place to expand its clean energy portfolio. With a strong commitment to sustainability and future-oriented investments, Constellation is well-positioned to benefit from the growing demand for carbon-free energy.

However, the company’s financial performance raises concerns. Both revenue and net income have fluctuated significantly over the past few years, and high COGS (Cost of Goods Sold) consumes a large portion of profits. Additionally, total shareholder equity has declined, as assets have remained stable while liabilities and debt have increased. These factors indicate potential financial instability and a lack of consistent profitability.

That said, it is crucial to consider that Constellation Energy only recently became an independent company, meaning the available financial data is somewhat limited. Moreover, rising liabilities are not uncommon for companies heavily investing in large-scale projects like nuclear and renewable energy. For growth-oriented investors who believe in the long-term potential of clean energy, Constellation Energy could be a compelling, albeit risky, investment. However, for value investors seeking a financially stable and undervalued company with strong past performance, Constellation Energy is not an ideal choice.

Dividends 101

What Is a Dividend?

A dividend is the distribution of some of a company’s earnings to a class of its shareholders, as determined by the company’s board of directors. Common shareholders of dividend-paying companies are typically eligible as long as they own the stock before the ex-dividend date. Dividends may be paid out as cash or in the form of additional stock or other property. Along with companies, various mutual funds and exchange-traded funds (ETF) also pay dividends.

A dividend is a token reward paid to the shareholders for their investment in a company’s equity, and it usually originates from the company’s net profits. While the major portion of the profits is kept within the company as retained earnings–which represent the money to be used for the company’s ongoing and future business activities–the remainder can be allocated to the shareholders as a dividend. At times, companies may still make dividend payments even when they don’t make suitable profits. They may do so to maintain their established track record of making regular dividend payments.

The board of directors can choose to issue dividends over various time frames and with different payout rates. Dividends can be paid at a scheduled frequency, such as monthly, quarterly or annually.

Companies that pay dividends

Companies can also issue non-recurring special dividends either individually or in addition to a scheduled dividend. Backed by strong business performance and an improved financial outlook,  for instance Microsoft Corp (MSFT) declared a special dividend of $3.00 per share in 2004, which was way above the usual quarterly dividends in the range of $0.08 to $0.16 per share.

Larger, more established companies with more predictable profits are often the best dividend payers. These companies tend to issue regular dividends because they seek to maximize shareholder wealth in ways aside from normal growth. Companies in the following industry sectors are observed to be maintaining a regular record of dividend payments: Basic materials, Oil and gas, Banks and financial, Healthcare and pharmaceuticals and Utilities. Companies structured as master limited partnership (MLP) and real estate investment trust (REIT) are also top dividend payers since their designations require specified distributions to shareholders.

Certain dividend-paying companies may go as far as establishing dividend payout targets, which are based on generated profits in a given year. For example, banks typically pay out a certain percentage of their profits in the form of cash dividends. If profits decline, dividend policy can be postponed to better times.

Start-ups and other high-growth companies, such as those in the technology or biotech sectors, may not offer regular dividends.


Because these companies may be in the early stages of development and may incur high costs (as well as losses) attributed to research and development, business expansion and operational activities, they may not have sufficient funds to issue dividends. Even profit-making early- to mid-stage companies avoid making dividend payments if they are aiming for higher-than-average growth and expansion, and want to invest their profits back into their business rather than paying dividends. The business growth cycle partially explains why growth firms do not pay dividends; they need these funds to expand their operations, build factories and increase their personnel.

Important Dividend Dates

Dividend payments follow a chronological order of events and the associated dates are important to determine the shareholders who qualify for receiving the dividend payment.

  • Announcement Date: Dividends are announced by company management on the announcement date,  and must be approved by the shareholders before they can be paid. Any change in the expected dividend payment can cause the stock to rise or fall quickly as traders adjust to new expectations. The ex-dividend date and record date will occur after the declaration date. Once a dividend is declared on the announcement date, the company has a legal responsibility to pay it.
  • Ex-Dividend Date: The date on which the dividend eligibility expires is called the ex-dividend date or simply the ex-date. For instance, if a stock has an ex-date of Monday, May 5, then shareholders who buy the stock on or after that day will NOT qualify to get the dividend as they are buying it on or after the dividend expiry date. Shareholders who own the stock one business day prior to the ex-date – that is on Friday, May 2, or earlier – will receive the dividend. The value of a share of stock goes down by about the dividend amount when the stock goes ex-dividend.
  • Record Date: The record date is the cut-off date, established by the company in order to determine which shareholders are eligible to receive a dividend or distribution.
  • Payment Date: The company issues the payment of the dividend on the payment date which is when the money gets credited to investors’ accounts.

The dividend may rise on the announcement approximately by the amount of the dividend declared and then decline by a similar amount at the opening session of the ex-dividend date.

For example, a company that is trading at $50 per share declares a $5 dividend on the announcement date. As soon as the news becomes public, the share price shoots up by around $5 and hit $55. Say the stock trades at $52 one business day prior to the ex-dividend date. On the ex-dividend date, it comes down by a similar $5 and begins trading at $50 at the start of the trading session on the ex-dividend date, because anyone buying on the ex-dividend date will not receive the dividend.

Why companies pay dividend

Companies pay dividends for a variety of reasons. Dividends can be expected by the shareholders as a reward for their trust in a company. The company management may aim to honor this sentiment by delivering a robust track record of dividend payments. Dividend payments reflect positively on a company and help maintain investors’ trust.


A high-value dividend declaration can indicate that the company is doing well and has generated good profits. But it can also indicate that the company does not have suitable projects to generate better returns in the future. Therefore, it is utilizing its cash to pay shareholders instead of reinvesting it into growth

One of the simplest ways for companies to foster goodwill among their shareholders, drive demand for the stock, and communicate financial well-being and shareholder value is through paying dividends. Paying dividends sends a message about a company’s future prospects and performance. Its willingness and ability to pay steady dividends over time provides a solid demonstration of financial strength. Mature firms that believe they can increase value by reinvesting their earnings will choose not to pay dividends.

If a company has a long history of dividend payments, a reduction of the dividend amount, or its elimination, may signal to investors that the company is in trouble. The announcement of a 50% decrease in dividends from General Electric Co. (GE), one of the biggest American industrial companies, was accompanied by a decline of more than six percent in GE’s stock price on November 13, 2017.

A reduction in dividend amount or a decision against making any dividend payment may not necessarily translate into bad news about a company. It may be possible that the company’s management has better plans for investing the money, given its financials and operations. For example, a company’s management may choose to invest in a high-return project that has the potential to magnify returns for shareholders in the long run, as compared to the petty gains they will realize through dividend payments.

It could be when the pricing and conditions are just right for a stock buyback; weathering a major recession becomes the priority; or a company needs to accumulate cash on hand for a big merger or acquisition. 

Forms of dividend

A cash dividend is a payment doled out by a company to its stockholders in the form of periodic distributions of cash. Most brokers offer a choice to accept or reinvest cash dividends; reinvesting dividends is often a smart choice for investors with a long-term focus.

A stock dividend is a dividend payment to shareholders that is made in shares rather than as cash. The stock dividend has the advantage of rewarding shareholders without reducing the company’s cash balance, although it can dilute earnings per share. This type of dividend may be made when a company wants to reward its investors but doesn’t have the spare cash or wants to preserve its cash for other investments. This, however, like the cash dividend, does not increase the value of the company. If the company was priced at $10 per share, the value of the company would be $10 million. After the stock dividend, the value will remain the same, but the share price will decrease to $9.52 to adjust for the dividend payout.

Stock dividends can have a negative impact on share price in the short-term. Because it increases the number of shares outstanding while the value of the company remains stable, it dilutes the book value per common share, and the stock price is reduced accordingly.

Fund Dividends v. Company dividends

Dividends paid by funds are different from dividends paid by companies. Company dividends are usually paid from profits that are generated from the company’s business operations. Funds work on the principle of net asset value (NAV), which reflects the valuation of their holdings or the price of the asset(s) that a fund may be tracking. Since funds don’t have any intrinsic profits, they pay dividends sourced from their NAV.

Due to the NAV-based working of funds, regular and high-frequency dividend payments should not be misunderstood as a stellar performance by the fund. For example, a bond-investing fund may pay monthly dividends as it receives money in the form of monthly interest on its interest-bearing holdings. The fund is merely transferring the income from the interest fully or partially to the fund investors. A stock-investing fund may also pay dividends. Its dividends may come from the dividend(s) it receives from the stocks held in its portfolio, or by selling a certain quantity of stocks. It’s likely the investors receiving the dividend from the fund are reducing their holding value, which gets reflected in the reduced NAV on the ex-dividend date.


Arguments Against Dividends

Some financial analyst believe that the consideration of a dividend policy is irrelevant because investors have the ability to create “homemade” dividends. These analysts claim that income is achieved by investors adjusting their asset allocation in their portfolios.

For example, investors looking for a steady income stream are more likely to invest in bonds where the interest payments don’t fluctuate, rather than a dividend-paying stock, where the underlying price of the stock can fluctuate. As a result, bond investors don’t care about a particular company’s dividend policy because their interest payments from their bond investments are fixed.

Another argument against dividends claims that little to no dividend payout is more favorable for investors. Supporters of this policy point out that taxation on a dividend is higher than on a capital gain (In the US). The argument against dividends is based on the belief that a company which reinvests funds (rather than paying them out as dividends) will increase the value of the company in the long-term and, as a result, increase the market value of the stock. According to proponents of this policy, a company’s alternatives to paying out excess cash as dividends are the following: undertaking more projects, repurchasing the company’s own shares, acquiring new companies and profitable assets, and reinvesting in financial assets.

Arguments for Dividends

Proponents of dividends point out that a high dividend payout is important for investors because dividends provide certainty about the company’s financial well-being. Typically, companies that have consistently paid dividends are some of the most stable companies over the past several decades. As a result, a company that pays out a dividend attracts investors and creates demand for their stock.

Dividends are also attractive for investors looking to generate income. However, a decrease or increase in dividend distributions can affect the price of a security. The stock prices of companies that have a long-standing history of dividend payouts would be negatively affected if they reduced their dividend distributions. Conversely, companies that increased their dividend payouts or companies that instituted a new dividend policy would likely see appreciation in their stocks. Investors also see a dividend payment as a sign of a company’s strength and a sign that management has positive expectations for future earnings, which again makes the stock more attractive. A greater demand for a company’s stock will increase its price. Paying dividends sends a clear, powerful message about a company’s future prospects and performance, and its willingness and ability to pay steady dividends over time provides a solid demonstration of financial strength.


Dividend-Paying Methods:

Companies that decide to pay a dividend might use one of the three methods outlined below.

1.     Residual

Companies using the residual dividend policy choose to rely on internally generated equity to finance any new projects. As a result, dividend payments can come out of the residual or leftover equity only after all project capital requirements are met.

The benefits to this policy is that it allows a company to use their retained earnings or residual income to invest back into the company, or into other profitable projects before returning funds back to shareholders in the form of dividends.

As stated earlier, a company’s stock price fluctuates with a rising or falling dividend. If a company’s management team doesn’t believe they can adhere to a strict dividend policy with consistent payouts, it might opt for the residual method. The management team is free to pursue opportunities without being constricted by a dividend policy. However, investors might demand a higher stock price relative to companies in the same industry that have more consistent dividend payouts. Another drawback to the residual method is that it can lead to inconsistent and sporadic dividend payouts resulting in volatility in the company’s stock price.

2.     Stable

Under the stable dividend policy, companies consistently pay a dividend each year regardless of earnings fluctuations. The dividend payout amount is typically determined through forecasting long-term earnings and calculating a percentage of earnings to be paid out.

Under the stable policy, companies may create a target payout ratio, which is a percentage of earnings that is to be paid to shareholders in the long-term.

The company may choose a cyclical policy that sets dividends at a fixed fraction of quarterly earnings, or it may choose a stable policy whereby quarterly dividends are set at a fraction of yearly earnings. In either case, the aim of the stability policy is to reduce uncertainty for investors and to provide them with income.

3.    Hybrid

The final approach combines the residual and stable dividend policies. The hybrid is a popular approach for companies that pay dividends. As companies experience business cycle fluctuations, companies that use the hybrid approach establish a set dividend, which represents a relatively small portion of yearly income and can be easily maintained. In addition to the set dividend, companies can offer an extra dividend paid only when income exceeds certain benchmarks.

Is Dividend Investing a Good Strategy?

Investors should be aware of extremely high yields, since there is an inverse relationship between stock price and dividend yield and the distribution might not be sustainable. Stocks that pay dividends typically provide stability to a portfolio, but do not usually outperform high-quality growth stocks.

It may be counter-intuitive, but as a stock’s price increases, its dividend yield actually decreases. Dividend yield is a ratio of how much cash flow you are getting for each dollar invested in a stock. Many novice investors may incorrectly assume that a higher stock price correlates to a higher dividend yield. Let’s delve into how dividend yield is calculated, so we can grasp this inverse relationship.

If you own 100 shares of the ABC Corporation, the 100 shares is your basis for dividend distribution. Assume for the moment that ABC Corporation was purchased at $100 per share, which implies a total investment of $10,000. Profits at the ABC Corporation were unusually high, so the board of directors agrees to pay its shareholders $10 per share annually in the form of a cash dividend. So, as an owner of ABC Corporation for a year, your continued investment in ABC Corp result in $1,000 dollars of dividends. The annual yield is the total dividend amount ($1,000) divided by the cost of the stock ($10,000) which equals 10 percent.

If ABC Corporation was purchased at $200 per share instead, the yield would drop to five percent, since 100 shares now costs $20,000 (or your original $10,000 only gets you 50 shares, instead of 100). As illustrated above, if the price of the stock moves higher, then dividend yield drops and vice versa. From an investment strategy perspective, buying established companies with a history of good dividends adds stability to a portfolio. This is why many investing legends such as John Bogle, Warren Buffet and Benjamin Graham advocate buying stocks that pay dividends as a critical part of the total “investment” return of an asset.


The Risks to Dividends

During the 2008-2009 financial crisis, almost all of the major banks either slashed or eliminated their dividend payouts. These companies were known for consistent, stable dividend payouts each quarter for literally hundreds of years. Despite their storied histories, many dividends were cut.

In other words, dividends are not guaranteed, and are subject to macroeconomic as well as company-specific risks. Another potential downside to investing in dividend-paying stocks is that companies that pay dividends are not usually high-growth leaders. There are some exceptions, but high-growth companies usually do not pay sizable amounts of dividends to its shareholders even if they have significantly outperformed the vast majority of stocks over time. Growth companies tend to spend more dollars on research and development, capital expansion, retaining talented employees and/or mergers and acquisitions. For these companies, all earnings are considered retained earnings, and are reinvested back into the company instead of issuing a dividend to shareholders.

It is equally important to beware of companies with extraordinarily high yields. As we have learned, if a company’s stock price continues to decline, its yield goes up. Many rookie investors get teased into purchasing a stock just on the basis of a potentially juicy dividend. There is no specific rule of thumb in relation to how much is too much in terms of a dividend payout.

The average dividend yield on S&P 500 index  companies that pay a dividend historically fluctuates somewhere between 2 and 5 percent, depending on market conditions. In general, it pays to do your homework on stocks yielding more than 8 percent to find out what is truly going on with the company. Doing this due diligence will help you decipher those companies that are truly in financial shambles from those that are temporarily out of favor, and therefore present a good investment value proposition.

Once a company starts paying dividends, it is highly atypical for it to stop. Dividends are a good way to  give an investment portfolio additional stability, since the periodical cash payments are likely to continue long term. 

A company must keep growing at an above-average pace to justify reinvesting in itself rather than paying a dividend. Generally speaking, when a company’s growth slows, its stock won’t climb as much, and dividends will be necessary to keep shareholders around. The slowdown of this growth happens to virtually all companies after they attain a large market capitalization. A company will simply reach a size at which it no longer has the potential to grow at annual rates of 30% to 40%, like a small cap, regardless of how much money is plowed back into it. At a certain point, the law of large numbers makes a mega-cap company and growth rates that outperform the market an impossible combination.

There is another motivation for a company to pay dividends —a steadily increasing dividend payout is viewed as a strong indication of a company’s continuing success. The great thing about dividends is that they can’t be faked; they are either paid or not paid, increased or not increased.

This isn’t the case with earnings, which are basically an accountant’s best guess of a company’s profitability. All too often, companies must restate their past reported earnings because of aggressive accounting practices, and this can cause considerable trouble for investors, who may have already based future stock price predictions on these unreliable historical earnings. Expected groeth rates are also unreliable

Since they can be regarded as quasi-bonds, dividend-paying stocks tend to exhibit pricing characteristics that are moderately different from those of growth stocks. This is because they provide regular income that is similar to a bond, but they still provide investors with the potential to benefit from share price appreciation if the company does well.

Investors looking for exposure to the growth potential of the equity market and the safety of the (moderately) fixed income provided by dividends should consider adding stocks with high dividend yields to their portfolio. A portfolio with dividend-paying stocks is likely to see less price volatility than a growth stock portfolio. 


Misconceptions About Dividend Stocks

The biggest misconception of dividend stocks is that a high yield is always a good thing. Many dividend investors simply choose a collection of the highest dividend-paying stock and hope for the best. For a number of reasons, this is not always a good idea. 

Dividend Stocks are Always Boring. Some of the best traits a dividend stock can have are the announcement of a new dividend, high dividend growth metrics over recent years, or the potential to commit more and raise the dividend (even if the current yield is low). Any of these announcements can jolt the stock price and result in a greater total return. Sure, trying to predict management’s dividends and whether a dividend stock will go up in the future is not easy, but there are several indicators.  If a stock has a low dividend payout ratio but it is generating high levels of free cash flow, it obviously has room to increase its dividend. Earnings growth is one indicator but also keep an eye on cash flow and revenues as well. If a company is growing organically (i.e. increased foot traffic, sales, margins), then it may only be a matter of time before the dividend is increased. However, if a company’s growth is coming from high-risk investments or international expansion then a dividend could be less certain

Dividend Stocks are Always Safe. Just because a company is producing dividends doesn’t always make it a safe bet. Management can use the dividend to placate frustrated investors when the stock isn’t moving. (In fact, many companies have been known to do this.) Therefore, to avoid dividend traps, it’s always important to at least consider how management is using the dividend in its corporate strategy. Dividends that are consolation prizes to investors for a lack of growth are almost always bad ideas. 

Compounding Effect

If dividends are re-invested it can create a compounding effect as show in the graphs below gathered from visualcapitalist.

Figures retrieved from https://www.visualcapitalist.com/power-dividend-investing/

Dividend Yield

The dividend yield, expressed as a percentage, is a financial ratio (dividend/price) that shows how much a company pays out in dividends each year relative to its stock price.

The dividend yield is an estimate of the dividend-only return of a stock investment. Assuming the dividend is not raised or lowered, the yield will rise when the price of the stock falls. Because dividend yields change relative to the stock price, it can often look unusually high for stocks that are falling in value quickly.

Figure retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dividend_yield

The dividend yield can be calculated from the last full year’s financial report. This is acceptable during the first few months after the company has released its annual report; however, the longer it has been since the annual report, the less relevant that data is for investors. Alternatively, investors can also add the last four quarters of dividends, which captures the trailing 12 months of dividend data. Using a trailing dividend number is acceptable, but it can make the yield too high or too low if the dividend has recently been cut or raised.

Because dividends are paid quarterly, many investors will take the last quarterly dividend, multiply it by four, and use the product as the annual dividend for the yield calculation. This approach will reflect any recent changes in the dividend, but not all companies pay an even quarterly dividend. Some firms, especially outside the U.S., pay a small quarterly dividend with a large annual dividend. If the dividend calculation is performed after the large dividend distribution, it will give an inflated yield. Finally, some companies pay a dividend more frequently than quarterly. A monthly dividend could result in a dividend yield calculation that is too low. When deciding how to calculate the dividend yield, an investor should look at the history of dividend payments to decide which method will give the most accurate results.

Historical evidence suggests that a focus on dividends may amplify returns rather than slow them down. For example, according to analysts at Hartford Funds, since 1970, 78% of the total returns from the S&500 are from dividends. This assumption is based on the fact that investors are likely to reinvest their dividends back into the S&P 500, which then compounds their ability to earn more dividends in the future.

When comparing measures of corporate dividends,  it’s important to note that the dividend yield tells you what the simple rate of return is in the form of cash dividends to shareholders. However, the dividend payout ratio represents how much of a company’s net earnings are paid out as dividends. While the dividend yield is the more commonly used term, many believe the dividend payout ratio is a better indicator of a company’s ability to distribute dividends consistently in the future. The dividend payout ratio is highly connected to a company’s cash flow.

The dividend yield shows how much a company has paid out in dividends over the course of a year. The yield is presented as a percentage, not as an actual dollar amount. This makes it easier to see how much return the shareholder can expect to receive per dollar they have invested.

A forward dividend yield is the percentage of a company’s current stock price that it expects to pay out as dividends over a certain time period, generally 12 months. Forward dividend yields are generally used in circumstances where the yield is predictable based on past instances. If not, trailing yields, which indicate the same value over the previous 12 months, are used.

Figure retrieved from https://www.visualcapitalist.com/power-dividend-investing/


A dividend aristocrat is a company that has increased its dividends for at least 25 consecutive years.

Dividend Payout Ratio

The dividend payout ratio is the ratio of the total amount of dividends paid out to shareholders relative to the net income of the company. It is the percentage of earnings paid to shareholders in dividends. The amount that is not paid to shareholders is retained by the company to pay off debt or to reinvest in core operations. It is sometimes simply referred to as the ‘payout ratio.’

The dividend payout ratio provides an indication of how much money a company is returning to shareholders versus how much it is keeping on hand to reinvest in growth, pay off debt, or add to cash reserves (retained earnings). 

Retrieved from https://www.educba.com/payout-ratio-formula/

Dividend Payout Ratio=1−Retention Ratio​

Retention Ratio=(EPS−DPS)/EPS

Some companies pay out all their earnings to shareholders, while some only pay out a portion of their earnings. If a company pays out some of its earnings as dividends, the remaining portion is retained by the business. To measure the level of earnings retained, the retention ratio is calculated.

Several considerations go into interpreting the dividend payout ratio, most importantly the company’s level of maturity. A new, growth-oriented company that aims to expand, develop new products, and move into new markets would be expected to reinvest most or all of its earnings and could be forgiven for having a low or even zero payout ratio. The payout ratio is 0% for companies that do not pay dividends and is 100% for companies that pay out their entire net income as dividends.

The payout ratio is also useful for assessing a dividend’s sustainability. Companies are extremely reluctant to cut dividends since it can drive the stock price down and reflect poorly on management’s abilities. If a company’s payout ratio is over 100%, it is returning more money to shareholders than it is earning and will probably be forced to lower the dividend or stop paying it altogether. That result is not inevitable, however. A company endures a bad year without suspending payouts, and it is often in their interest to do so. It is therefore important to consider future earnings expectations and calculate a forward-looking payout ratio to contextualize the backward-looking one.

Long-term trends in the payout ratio also matter. A steadily rising ratio could indicate a healthy, maturing business, but a spiking one could mean the dividend is heading into unsustainable territory.

The retention ratio is a converse concept to the dividend payout ratio. The dividend payout ratio evaluates the percentage of profits earned that a company pays out to its shareholders, while the retention ratio represents the percentage of profits earned that are retained by or reinvested in the company.

Dividend payouts vary widely by industry, and like most ratios, they are most useful to compare within a given industry

The augmented payout ratio incorporates share buybacks into the metric; it is calculated by dividing the sum of dividends and buybacks by net income for the same period. If the result is too high, it can indicate an emphasis on short-term boosts to share prices at the expense of reinvestment and long-term growth. Another adjustment that can be made to provide a more accurate picture is to subtract preferred stock dividends for companies that issue preferred shares.

Dividends Per Share

Dividends per share (DPS) measures the total amount of profits a company pays out to its shareholders, generally over a year, on a per-share basis. DPS can be calculated by subtracting the special dividends from the sum of all dividends over one year and dividing this figure by the outstanding shares

Retrieved from https://www.tickertape.in/glossary/dividend-per-share-meaning/

There are two primary reasons for increases in a company’s dividends per share payout.

  1. The first is simply an increase in the company’s net profits out of which dividends are paid. If the company is performing well and cash flows are improving, there is more room to pay shareholders higher dividends. In this context, a dividend hike is a positive indicator of company performance.
  2. The second reason a company might hike its dividend is because of a shift in the company’s growth strategy, which leads the company to expend less of its cash flow and earnings on growth and expansion, thus leaving a larger share of profits available to be returned to equity investors in the form of dividends.

Dividend Growth Rate

Dividend growth calculates the annualized average rate of increase in the dividends paid by a company. Calculating the dividend growth rate is necessary for using a dividend discount model for valuing stocks.  The dividend discount model is a type of security-pricing model. The dividend discount model assumes that the estimated future dividends–discounted by the excess of internal growth over the company’s estimated dividend growth rate–determines a given stock’s price. If the dividend discount model procedure results in a higher number than the current prize of a company’s shares, the model considers the stock undervalued. Investors who use the dividend discount model believe that by estimating the expected value of cash flow in the future, they can find the intrinsic value of a specific stock. A history of strong dividend growth could mean future dividend growth is likely, which can signal long-term profitability.

Dividend capture strategy

A dividend capture strategy is a timing-oriented investment strategy involving the timed purchase and subsequent sale of dividend-paying stocks. Dividend capture is specifically calls for buying a stock just prior to the ex-dividend date in order to receive the dividend, then selling it immediately after the dividend is paid.The purpose of the two trades is simply to receive the dividend, as opposed to investing for the longer term. Because markets tend to be somewhat efficient, stocks usually decline in value immediately following ex-dividend, the viability of this strategy has come into question.

Theoretically, the dividend capture strategy shouldn’t work. If markets operated with perfect logic, then the dividend amount would be exactly reflected in the share price until the ex-dividend date, when the stock price would fall by exactly the dividend amount. Since markets do not operate with such mathematical perfection, it doesn’t usually happen that way. Most often, a trader captures a substantial portion of the dividend despite selling the stock at a slight loss following the ex-dividend date. A typical example would be a stock trading at $20 per share, paying a $1 dividend, falling in price on the ex-date only down to $19.50, which enables a trader to realize a net profit of $0.50, successfully capturing half the dividend in profit.

Transaction costs further decrease the sum of realized returns. The potential gains from a pure dividend capture strategy are typically small, while possible losses can be considerable if a negative market movement occurs within the holding period.  A drop in stock value on the ex-date which exceeds the amount of the dividend may force the investor to maintain the position for an extended period of time, introducing systematic and company-specific risk into the strategy. Adverse market movements can quickly eliminate any potential gains from this dividend capture approach. In order to minimize these risks, the strategy should be focused on short term holdings of large blue-chip companies. If dividend capture was consistently profitable, computer-driven investment strategies would have already exploited this opportunity.

Analysis Check

  1. Notable dividend: Is the companies dividend notable compared to the bottom 25% of dividend players in the country’s(eg. Norwegian) market.
  2. High dividend: How does the companies dividend compare to the top 25% of dividend players in the country’s market.
  3. Stable dividend: Have the dividend payments been stable in the past 10 years
  4. Growing dividend: Have the dividend payments grown over the last 10 years.
  5. Dividend coverage: Are the dividend covered by the earnings. Look at payout ratio.
  6. Future dividend coverage: is the dividend forecasted to be covered by earnings in three years? Look at payout ratio.

Warren Buffet Advice:

Dividends 101

What Is a Dividend?

A dividend is the distribution of some of a company’s earnings to a class of its shareholders, as determined by the company’s board of directors. Common shareholders of dividend-paying companies are typically eligible as long as they own the stock before the ex-dividend date. Dividends may be paid out as cash or in the form of additional stock or other property. Along with companies, various mutual funds and exchange-traded funds (ETF) also pay dividends.

A dividend is a token reward paid to the shareholders for their investment in a company’s equity, and it usually originates from the company’s net profits. While the major portion of the profits is kept within the company as retained earnings–which represent the money to be used for the company’s ongoing and future business activities–the remainder can be allocated to the shareholders as a dividend. At times, companies may still make dividend payments even when they don’t make suitable profits. They may do so to maintain their established track record of making regular dividend payments.

The board of directors can choose to issue dividends over various time frames and with different payout rates. Dividends can be paid at a scheduled frequency, such as monthly, quarterly or annually.

Companies that pay dividends

Companies can also issue non-recurring special dividends either individually or in addition to a scheduled dividend. Backed by strong business performance and an improved financial outlook,  for instance Microsoft Corp (MSFT) declared a special dividend of $3.00 per share in 2004, which was way above the usual quarterly dividends in the range of $0.08 to $0.16 per share.

Larger, more established companies with more predictable profits are often the best dividend payers. These companies tend to issue regular dividends because they seek to maximize shareholder wealth in ways aside from normal growth. Companies in the following industry sectors are observed to be maintaining a regular record of dividend payments: Basic materials, Oil and gas, Banks and financial, Healthcare and pharmaceuticals and Utilities. Companies structured as master limited partnership (MLP) and real estate investment trust (REIT) are also top dividend payers since their designations require specified distributions to shareholders.

Certain dividend-paying companies may go as far as establishing dividend payout targets, which are based on generated profits in a given year. For example, banks typically pay out a certain percentage of their profits in the form of cash dividends. If profits decline, dividend policy can be postponed to better times.

Start-ups and other high-growth companies, such as those in the technology or biotech sectors, may not offer regular dividends.


Because these companies may be in the early stages of development and may incur high costs (as well as losses) attributed to research and development, business expansion and operational activities, they may not have sufficient funds to issue dividends. Even profit-making early- to mid-stage companies avoid making dividend payments if they are aiming for higher-than-average growth and expansion, and want to invest their profits back into their business rather than paying dividends. The business growth cycle partially explains why growth firms do not pay dividends; they need these funds to expand their operations, build factories and increase their personnel.

Important Dividend Dates

Dividend payments follow a chronological order of events and the associated dates are important to determine the shareholders who qualify for receiving the dividend payment.

  • Announcement Date: Dividends are announced by company management on the announcement date,  and must be approved by the shareholders before they can be paid. Any change in the expected dividend payment can cause the stock to rise or fall quickly as traders adjust to new expectations. The ex-dividend date and record date will occur after the declaration date. Once a dividend is declared on the announcement date, the company has a legal responsibility to pay it.
  • Ex-Dividend Date: The date on which the dividend eligibility expires is called the ex-dividend date or simply the ex-date. For instance, if a stock has an ex-date of Monday, May 5, then shareholders who buy the stock on or after that day will NOT qualify to get the dividend as they are buying it on or after the dividend expiry date. Shareholders who own the stock one business day prior to the ex-date – that is on Friday, May 2, or earlier – will receive the dividend. The value of a share of stock goes down by about the dividend amount when the stock goes ex-dividend.
  • Record Date: The record date is the cut-off date, established by the company in order to determine which shareholders are eligible to receive a dividend or distribution.
  • Payment Date: The company issues the payment of the dividend on the payment date which is when the money gets credited to investors’ accounts.

The dividend may rise on the announcement approximately by the amount of the dividend declared and then decline by a similar amount at the opening session of the ex-dividend date.

For example, a company that is trading at $50 per share declares a $5 dividend on the announcement date. As soon as the news becomes public, the share price shoots up by around $5 and hit $55. Say the stock trades at $52 one business day prior to the ex-dividend date. On the ex-dividend date, it comes down by a similar $5 and begins trading at $50 at the start of the trading session on the ex-dividend date, because anyone buying on the ex-dividend date will not receive the dividend.

Why companies pay dividend

Companies pay dividends for a variety of reasons. Dividends can be expected by the shareholders as a reward for their trust in a company. The company management may aim to honor this sentiment by delivering a robust track record of dividend payments. Dividend payments reflect positively on a company and help maintain investors’ trust.


A high-value dividend declaration can indicate that the company is doing well and has generated good profits. But it can also indicate that the company does not have suitable projects to generate better returns in the future. Therefore, it is utilizing its cash to pay shareholders instead of reinvesting it into growth

One of the simplest ways for companies to foster goodwill among their shareholders, drive demand for the stock, and communicate financial well-being and shareholder value is through paying dividends. Paying dividends sends a message about a company’s future prospects and performance. Its willingness and ability to pay steady dividends over time provides a solid demonstration of financial strength. Mature firms that believe they can increase value by reinvesting their earnings will choose not to pay dividends.

If a company has a long history of dividend payments, a reduction of the dividend amount, or its elimination, may signal to investors that the company is in trouble. The announcement of a 50% decrease in dividends from General Electric Co. (GE), one of the biggest American industrial companies, was accompanied by a decline of more than six percent in GE’s stock price on November 13, 2017.

A reduction in dividend amount or a decision against making any dividend payment may not necessarily translate into bad news about a company. It may be possible that the company’s management has better plans for investing the money, given its financials and operations. For example, a company’s management may choose to invest in a high-return project that has the potential to magnify returns for shareholders in the long run, as compared to the petty gains they will realize through dividend payments.

It could be when the pricing and conditions are just right for a stock buyback; weathering a major recession becomes the priority; or a company needs to accumulate cash on hand for a big merger or acquisition. 

Forms of dividend

A cash dividend is a payment doled out by a company to its stockholders in the form of periodic distributions of cash. Most brokers offer a choice to accept or reinvest cash dividends; reinvesting dividends is often a smart choice for investors with a long-term focus.

A stock dividend is a dividend payment to shareholders that is made in shares rather than as cash. The stock dividend has the advantage of rewarding shareholders without reducing the company’s cash balance, although it can dilute earnings per share. This type of dividend may be made when a company wants to reward its investors but doesn’t have the spare cash or wants to preserve its cash for other investments. This, however, like the cash dividend, does not increase the value of the company. If the company was priced at $10 per share, the value of the company would be $10 million. After the stock dividend, the value will remain the same, but the share price will decrease to $9.52 to adjust for the dividend payout.

Stock dividends can have a negative impact on share price in the short-term. Because it increases the number of shares outstanding while the value of the company remains stable, it dilutes the book value per common share, and the stock price is reduced accordingly.

Fund Dividends v. Company dividends

Dividends paid by funds are different from dividends paid by companies. Company dividends are usually paid from profits that are generated from the company’s business operations. Funds work on the principle of net asset value (NAV), which reflects the valuation of their holdings or the price of the asset(s) that a fund may be tracking. Since funds don’t have any intrinsic profits, they pay dividends sourced from their NAV.

Due to the NAV-based working of funds, regular and high-frequency dividend payments should not be misunderstood as a stellar performance by the fund. For example, a bond-investing fund may pay monthly dividends as it receives money in the form of monthly interest on its interest-bearing holdings. The fund is merely transferring the income from the interest fully or partially to the fund investors. A stock-investing fund may also pay dividends. Its dividends may come from the dividend(s) it receives from the stocks held in its portfolio, or by selling a certain quantity of stocks. It’s likely the investors receiving the dividend from the fund are reducing their holding value, which gets reflected in the reduced NAV on the ex-dividend date.


Arguments Against Dividends

Some financial analyst believe that the consideration of a dividend policy is irrelevant because investors have the ability to create “homemade” dividends. These analysts claim that income is achieved by investors adjusting their asset allocation in their portfolios.

For example, investors looking for a steady income stream are more likely to invest in bonds where the interest payments don’t fluctuate, rather than a dividend-paying stock, where the underlying price of the stock can fluctuate. As a result, bond investors don’t care about a particular company’s dividend policy because their interest payments from their bond investments are fixed.

Another argument against dividends claims that little to no dividend payout is more favorable for investors. Supporters of this policy point out that taxation on a dividend is higher than on a capital gain (In the US). The argument against dividends is based on the belief that a company which reinvests funds (rather than paying them out as dividends) will increase the value of the company in the long-term and, as a result, increase the market value of the stock. According to proponents of this policy, a company’s alternatives to paying out excess cash as dividends are the following: undertaking more projects, repurchasing the company’s own shares, acquiring new companies and profitable assets, and reinvesting in financial assets.

Arguments for Dividends

Proponents of dividends point out that a high dividend payout is important for investors because dividends provide certainty about the company’s financial well-being. Typically, companies that have consistently paid dividends are some of the most stable companies over the past several decades. As a result, a company that pays out a dividend attracts investors and creates demand for their stock.

Dividends are also attractive for investors looking to generate income. However, a decrease or increase in dividend distributions can affect the price of a security. The stock prices of companies that have a long-standing history of dividend payouts would be negatively affected if they reduced their dividend distributions. Conversely, companies that increased their dividend payouts or companies that instituted a new dividend policy would likely see appreciation in their stocks. Investors also see a dividend payment as a sign of a company’s strength and a sign that management has positive expectations for future earnings, which again makes the stock more attractive. A greater demand for a company’s stock will increase its price. Paying dividends sends a clear, powerful message about a company’s future prospects and performance, and its willingness and ability to pay steady dividends over time provides a solid demonstration of financial strength.


Dividend-Paying Methods:

Companies that decide to pay a dividend might use one of the three methods outlined below.

1.     Residual

Companies using the residual dividend policy choose to rely on internally generated equity to finance any new projects. As a result, dividend payments can come out of the residual or leftover equity only after all project capital requirements are met.

The benefits to this policy is that it allows a company to use their retained earnings or residual income to invest back into the company, or into other profitable projects before returning funds back to shareholders in the form of dividends.

As stated earlier, a company’s stock price fluctuates with a rising or falling dividend. If a company’s management team doesn’t believe they can adhere to a strict dividend policy with consistent payouts, it might opt for the residual method. The management team is free to pursue opportunities without being constricted by a dividend policy. However, investors might demand a higher stock price relative to companies in the same industry that have more consistent dividend payouts. Another drawback to the residual method is that it can lead to inconsistent and sporadic dividend payouts resulting in volatility in the company’s stock price.

2.     Stable

Under the stable dividend policy, companies consistently pay a dividend each year regardless of earnings fluctuations. The dividend payout amount is typically determined through forecasting long-term earnings and calculating a percentage of earnings to be paid out.

Under the stable policy, companies may create a target payout ratio, which is a percentage of earnings that is to be paid to shareholders in the long-term.

The company may choose a cyclical policy that sets dividends at a fixed fraction of quarterly earnings, or it may choose a stable policy whereby quarterly dividends are set at a fraction of yearly earnings. In either case, the aim of the stability policy is to reduce uncertainty for investors and to provide them with income.

3.    Hybrid

The final approach combines the residual and stable dividend policies. The hybrid is a popular approach for companies that pay dividends. As companies experience business cycle fluctuations, companies that use the hybrid approach establish a set dividend, which represents a relatively small portion of yearly income and can be easily maintained. In addition to the set dividend, companies can offer an extra dividend paid only when income exceeds certain benchmarks.

Is Dividend Investing a Good Strategy?

Investors should be aware of extremely high yields, since there is an inverse relationship between stock price and dividend yield and the distribution might not be sustainable. Stocks that pay dividends typically provide stability to a portfolio, but do not usually outperform high-quality growth stocks.

It may be counter-intuitive, but as a stock’s price increases, its dividend yield actually decreases. Dividend yield is a ratio of how much cash flow you are getting for each dollar invested in a stock. Many novice investors may incorrectly assume that a higher stock price correlates to a higher dividend yield. Let’s delve into how dividend yield is calculated, so we can grasp this inverse relationship.

If you own 100 shares of the ABC Corporation, the 100 shares is your basis for dividend distribution. Assume for the moment that ABC Corporation was purchased at $100 per share, which implies a total investment of $10,000. Profits at the ABC Corporation were unusually high, so the board of directors agrees to pay its shareholders $10 per share annually in the form of a cash dividend. So, as an owner of ABC Corporation for a year, your continued investment in ABC Corp result in $1,000 dollars of dividends. The annual yield is the total dividend amount ($1,000) divided by the cost of the stock ($10,000) which equals 10 percent.

If ABC Corporation was purchased at $200 per share instead, the yield would drop to five percent, since 100 shares now costs $20,000 (or your original $10,000 only gets you 50 shares, instead of 100). As illustrated above, if the price of the stock moves higher, then dividend yield drops and vice versa. From an investment strategy perspective, buying established companies with a history of good dividends adds stability to a portfolio. This is why many investing legends such as John Bogle, Warren Buffet and Benjamin Graham advocate buying stocks that pay dividends as a critical part of the total “investment” return of an asset.


The Risks to Dividends

During the 2008-2009 financial crisis, almost all of the major banks either slashed or eliminated their dividend payouts. These companies were known for consistent, stable dividend payouts each quarter for literally hundreds of years. Despite their storied histories, many dividends were cut.

In other words, dividends are not guaranteed, and are subject to macroeconomic as well as company-specific risks. Another potential downside to investing in dividend-paying stocks is that companies that pay dividends are not usually high-growth leaders. There are some exceptions, but high-growth companies usually do not pay sizable amounts of dividends to its shareholders even if they have significantly outperformed the vast majority of stocks over time. Growth companies tend to spend more dollars on research and development, capital expansion, retaining talented employees and/or mergers and acquisitions. For these companies, all earnings are considered retained earnings, and are reinvested back into the company instead of issuing a dividend to shareholders.

It is equally important to beware of companies with extraordinarily high yields. As we have learned, if a company’s stock price continues to decline, its yield goes up. Many rookie investors get teased into purchasing a stock just on the basis of a potentially juicy dividend. There is no specific rule of thumb in relation to how much is too much in terms of a dividend payout.

The average dividend yield on S&P 500 index  companies that pay a dividend historically fluctuates somewhere between 2 and 5 percent, depending on market conditions. In general, it pays to do your homework on stocks yielding more than 8 percent to find out what is truly going on with the company. Doing this due diligence will help you decipher those companies that are truly in financial shambles from those that are temporarily out of favor, and therefore present a good investment value proposition.

Once a company starts paying dividends, it is highly atypical for it to stop. Dividends are a good way to  give an investment portfolio additional stability, since the periodical cash payments are likely to continue long term. 

A company must keep growing at an above-average pace to justify reinvesting in itself rather than paying a dividend. Generally speaking, when a company’s growth slows, its stock won’t climb as much, and dividends will be necessary to keep shareholders around. The slowdown of this growth happens to virtually all companies after they attain a large market capitalization. A company will simply reach a size at which it no longer has the potential to grow at annual rates of 30% to 40%, like a small cap, regardless of how much money is plowed back into it. At a certain point, the law of large numbers makes a mega-cap company and growth rates that outperform the market an impossible combination.

There is another motivation for a company to pay dividends —a steadily increasing dividend payout is viewed as a strong indication of a company’s continuing success. The great thing about dividends is that they can’t be faked; they are either paid or not paid, increased or not increased.

This isn’t the case with earnings, which are basically an accountant’s best guess of a company’s profitability. All too often, companies must restate their past reported earnings because of aggressive accounting practices, and this can cause considerable trouble for investors, who may have already based future stock price predictions on these unreliable historical earnings. Expected groeth rates are also unreliable

Since they can be regarded as quasi-bonds, dividend-paying stocks tend to exhibit pricing characteristics that are moderately different from those of growth stocks. This is because they provide regular income that is similar to a bond, but they still provide investors with the potential to benefit from share price appreciation if the company does well.

Investors looking for exposure to the growth potential of the equity market and the safety of the (moderately) fixed income provided by dividends should consider adding stocks with high dividend yields to their portfolio. A portfolio with dividend-paying stocks is likely to see less price volatility than a growth stock portfolio. 


Misconceptions About Dividend Stocks

The biggest misconception of dividend stocks is that a high yield is always a good thing. Many dividend investors simply choose a collection of the highest dividend-paying stock and hope for the best. For a number of reasons, this is not always a good idea. 

Dividend Stocks are Always Boring. Some of the best traits a dividend stock can have are the announcement of a new dividend, high dividend growth metrics over recent years, or the potential to commit more and raise the dividend (even if the current yield is low). Any of these announcements can jolt the stock price and result in a greater total return. Sure, trying to predict management’s dividends and whether a dividend stock will go up in the future is not easy, but there are several indicators.  If a stock has a low dividend payout ratio but it is generating high levels of free cash flow, it obviously has room to increase its dividend. Earnings growth is one indicator but also keep an eye on cash flow and revenues as well. If a company is growing organically (i.e. increased foot traffic, sales, margins), then it may only be a matter of time before the dividend is increased. However, if a company’s growth is coming from high-risk investments or international expansion then a dividend could be less certain

Dividend Stocks are Always Safe. Just because a company is producing dividends doesn’t always make it a safe bet. Management can use the dividend to placate frustrated investors when the stock isn’t moving. (In fact, many companies have been known to do this.) Therefore, to avoid dividend traps, it’s always important to at least consider how management is using the dividend in its corporate strategy. Dividends that are consolation prizes to investors for a lack of growth are almost always bad ideas. 

Compounding Effect

If dividends are re-invested it can create a compounding effect as show in the graphs below gathered from visualcapitalist.

Figures retrieved from https://www.visualcapitalist.com/power-dividend-investing/

Dividend Yield

The dividend yield, expressed as a percentage, is a financial ratio (dividend/price) that shows how much a company pays out in dividends each year relative to its stock price.

The dividend yield is an estimate of the dividend-only return of a stock investment. Assuming the dividend is not raised or lowered, the yield will rise when the price of the stock falls. Because dividend yields change relative to the stock price, it can often look unusually high for stocks that are falling in value quickly.

Figure retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dividend_yield

The dividend yield can be calculated from the last full year’s financial report. This is acceptable during the first few months after the company has released its annual report; however, the longer it has been since the annual report, the less relevant that data is for investors. Alternatively, investors can also add the last four quarters of dividends, which captures the trailing 12 months of dividend data. Using a trailing dividend number is acceptable, but it can make the yield too high or too low if the dividend has recently been cut or raised.

Because dividends are paid quarterly, many investors will take the last quarterly dividend, multiply it by four, and use the product as the annual dividend for the yield calculation. This approach will reflect any recent changes in the dividend, but not all companies pay an even quarterly dividend. Some firms, especially outside the U.S., pay a small quarterly dividend with a large annual dividend. If the dividend calculation is performed after the large dividend distribution, it will give an inflated yield. Finally, some companies pay a dividend more frequently than quarterly. A monthly dividend could result in a dividend yield calculation that is too low. When deciding how to calculate the dividend yield, an investor should look at the history of dividend payments to decide which method will give the most accurate results.

Historical evidence suggests that a focus on dividends may amplify returns rather than slow them down. For example, according to analysts at Hartford Funds, since 1970, 78% of the total returns from the S&500 are from dividends. This assumption is based on the fact that investors are likely to reinvest their dividends back into the S&P 500, which then compounds their ability to earn more dividends in the future.

When comparing measures of corporate dividends,  it’s important to note that the dividend yield tells you what the simple rate of return is in the form of cash dividends to shareholders. However, the dividend payout ratio represents how much of a company’s net earnings are paid out as dividends. While the dividend yield is the more commonly used term, many believe the dividend payout ratio is a better indicator of a company’s ability to distribute dividends consistently in the future. The dividend payout ratio is highly connected to a company’s cash flow.

The dividend yield shows how much a company has paid out in dividends over the course of a year. The yield is presented as a percentage, not as an actual dollar amount. This makes it easier to see how much return the shareholder can expect to receive per dollar they have invested.

A forward dividend yield is the percentage of a company’s current stock price that it expects to pay out as dividends over a certain time period, generally 12 months. Forward dividend yields are generally used in circumstances where the yield is predictable based on past instances. If not, trailing yields, which indicate the same value over the previous 12 months, are used.

Figure retrieved from https://www.visualcapitalist.com/power-dividend-investing/


A dividend aristocrat is a company that has increased its dividends for at least 25 consecutive years.

Dividend Payout Ratio

The dividend payout ratio is the ratio of the total amount of dividends paid out to shareholders relative to the net income of the company. It is the percentage of earnings paid to shareholders in dividends. The amount that is not paid to shareholders is retained by the company to pay off debt or to reinvest in core operations. It is sometimes simply referred to as the ‘payout ratio.’

The dividend payout ratio provides an indication of how much money a company is returning to shareholders versus how much it is keeping on hand to reinvest in growth, pay off debt, or add to cash reserves (retained earnings). 

Retrieved from https://www.educba.com/payout-ratio-formula/

Dividend Payout Ratio=1−Retention Ratio​

Retention Ratio=(EPS−DPS)/EPS

Some companies pay out all their earnings to shareholders, while some only pay out a portion of their earnings. If a company pays out some of its earnings as dividends, the remaining portion is retained by the business. To measure the level of earnings retained, the retention ratio is calculated.

Several considerations go into interpreting the dividend payout ratio, most importantly the company’s level of maturity. A new, growth-oriented company that aims to expand, develop new products, and move into new markets would be expected to reinvest most or all of its earnings and could be forgiven for having a low or even zero payout ratio. The payout ratio is 0% for companies that do not pay dividends and is 100% for companies that pay out their entire net income as dividends.

The payout ratio is also useful for assessing a dividend’s sustainability. Companies are extremely reluctant to cut dividends since it can drive the stock price down and reflect poorly on management’s abilities. If a company’s payout ratio is over 100%, it is returning more money to shareholders than it is earning and will probably be forced to lower the dividend or stop paying it altogether. That result is not inevitable, however. A company endures a bad year without suspending payouts, and it is often in their interest to do so. It is therefore important to consider future earnings expectations and calculate a forward-looking payout ratio to contextualize the backward-looking one.

Long-term trends in the payout ratio also matter. A steadily rising ratio could indicate a healthy, maturing business, but a spiking one could mean the dividend is heading into unsustainable territory.

The retention ratio is a converse concept to the dividend payout ratio. The dividend payout ratio evaluates the percentage of profits earned that a company pays out to its shareholders, while the retention ratio represents the percentage of profits earned that are retained by or reinvested in the company.

Dividend payouts vary widely by industry, and like most ratios, they are most useful to compare within a given industry

The augmented payout ratio incorporates share buybacks into the metric; it is calculated by dividing the sum of dividends and buybacks by net income for the same period. If the result is too high, it can indicate an emphasis on short-term boosts to share prices at the expense of reinvestment and long-term growth. Another adjustment that can be made to provide a more accurate picture is to subtract preferred stock dividends for companies that issue preferred shares.

Dividends Per Share

Dividends per share (DPS) measures the total amount of profits a company pays out to its shareholders, generally over a year, on a per-share basis. DPS can be calculated by subtracting the special dividends from the sum of all dividends over one year and dividing this figure by the outstanding shares

Retrieved from https://www.tickertape.in/glossary/dividend-per-share-meaning/

There are two primary reasons for increases in a company’s dividends per share payout.

  1. The first is simply an increase in the company’s net profits out of which dividends are paid. If the company is performing well and cash flows are improving, there is more room to pay shareholders higher dividends. In this context, a dividend hike is a positive indicator of company performance.
  2. The second reason a company might hike its dividend is because of a shift in the company’s growth strategy, which leads the company to expend less of its cash flow and earnings on growth and expansion, thus leaving a larger share of profits available to be returned to equity investors in the form of dividends.

Dividend Growth Rate

Dividend growth calculates the annualized average rate of increase in the dividends paid by a company. Calculating the dividend growth rate is necessary for using a dividend discount model for valuing stocks.  The dividend discount model is a type of security-pricing model. The dividend discount model assumes that the estimated future dividends–discounted by the excess of internal growth over the company’s estimated dividend growth rate–determines a given stock’s price. If the dividend discount model procedure results in a higher number than the current prize of a company’s shares, the model considers the stock undervalued. Investors who use the dividend discount model believe that by estimating the expected value of cash flow in the future, they can find the intrinsic value of a specific stock. A history of strong dividend growth could mean future dividend growth is likely, which can signal long-term profitability.

Dividend capture strategy

A dividend capture strategy is a timing-oriented investment strategy involving the timed purchase and subsequent sale of dividend-paying stocks. Dividend capture is specifically calls for buying a stock just prior to the ex-dividend date in order to receive the dividend, then selling it immediately after the dividend is paid.The purpose of the two trades is simply to receive the dividend, as opposed to investing for the longer term. Because markets tend to be somewhat efficient, stocks usually decline in value immediately following ex-dividend, the viability of this strategy has come into question.

Theoretically, the dividend capture strategy shouldn’t work. If markets operated with perfect logic, then the dividend amount would be exactly reflected in the share price until the ex-dividend date, when the stock price would fall by exactly the dividend amount. Since markets do not operate with such mathematical perfection, it doesn’t usually happen that way. Most often, a trader captures a substantial portion of the dividend despite selling the stock at a slight loss following the ex-dividend date. A typical example would be a stock trading at $20 per share, paying a $1 dividend, falling in price on the ex-date only down to $19.50, which enables a trader to realize a net profit of $0.50, successfully capturing half the dividend in profit.

Transaction costs further decrease the sum of realized returns. The potential gains from a pure dividend capture strategy are typically small, while possible losses can be considerable if a negative market movement occurs within the holding period.  A drop in stock value on the ex-date which exceeds the amount of the dividend may force the investor to maintain the position for an extended period of time, introducing systematic and company-specific risk into the strategy. Adverse market movements can quickly eliminate any potential gains from this dividend capture approach. In order to minimize these risks, the strategy should be focused on short term holdings of large blue-chip companies. If dividend capture was consistently profitable, computer-driven investment strategies would have already exploited this opportunity.

Analysis Check

  1. Notable dividend: Is the companies dividend notable compared to the bottom 25% of dividend players in the country’s(eg. Norwegian) market.
  2. High dividend: How does the companies dividend compare to the top 25% of dividend players in the country’s market.
  3. Stable dividend: Have the dividend payments been stable in the past 10 years
  4. Growing dividend: Have the dividend payments grown over the last 10 years.
  5. Dividend coverage: Are the dividend covered by the earnings. Look at payout ratio.
  6. Future dividend coverage: is the dividend forecasted to be covered by earnings in three years? Look at payout ratio.

Warren Buffet Advice:

Page 2 of 2

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén